1. Home
  2. Boston, MA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Altman & Altman

Altman & Altman

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.8 · 447 Google reviews3 offices9 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
1Practice areas

About Altman & Altman

Altman & Altman has worked from Cambridge since the 1960s, with offices on State Street in Boston and in Needham, and names nine attorneys including two Altmans. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish.

447 reviews at 4.84. It shares a surname with Altman Nussbaum Shunnarah and is a separate firm at separate addresses.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

447 client reviews

Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.84 average over 447 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

40out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Massachusetts does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (45% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 9 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint447 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2002-01-18, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which the New York advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved447 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.84 over 447 reviews → Bayesian 4.84 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle6 of 15 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-23) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 15 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · no fresh content1 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 18 → 44th pct of 27-firm cohort (median 20) 1/3 · 971 referring domains, 74th pct 1/2 · 1,122 organic keywords / 4,471 visits·mo, 96th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Boston x Personal Injury (28 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
18· 44th percentile
971 ref. domains · cohort median 20 · Ahrefs rank 9.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · disclaimer · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 54
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15

Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 9 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

  • David Altman
  • Steven Altman
  • Anthony K. O’Connor
  • Collin Lee
  • Justin A. Harriman
  • Richard J. Floor
  • Steven Goldwyn
  • Chelsey Guay
  • Tyler Fox

Client reviews

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 447 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 3 locations · main office: Cambridge

Cambridge675 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Boston1 State St Ste 2, Boston, MA 02109, USA
Needham250 1st Ave 2nd Floor, Needham, MA 02494, USA