- Home
- Boston, MA
- Personal Injury
- Altman & Altman
Altman & Altman
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas
About Altman & Altman
Altman & Altman has worked from Cambridge since the 1960s, with offices on State Street in Boston and in Needham, and names nine attorneys including two Altmans. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish.
447 reviews at 4.84. It shares a surname with Altman Nussbaum Shunnarah and is a separate firm at separate addresses.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
448 client reviews
Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.84 average over 448 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
50out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Massachusetts does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).
LFL Verified 202615 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (53% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 9 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint447 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2002-01-18, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of Massachusetts Bar Association, Boston Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved448 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.84 over 448 reviews → Bayesian 4.84 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle6 of 15 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-23) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 15 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · no fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 18 → 44th pct of 27-firm cohort (median 20) 1/3 · 971 referring domains, 74th pct 1/2 · 1,122 organic keywords / 4,471 visits·mo, 96th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Boston x Personal Injury (28 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
18· 44th percentile
971 ref. domains · cohort median 20 · Ahrefs rank 9.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · disclaimer · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 54
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 9 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.8
★★★★★
Based on 448 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 3 locations · main office: Cambridge
Cambridge675 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Boston1 State St Ste 2, Boston, MA 02109, USA
Needham250 1st Ave 2nd Floor, Needham, MA 02494, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Altman & Altman charge?
Altman & Altman publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Altman & Altman offer a free consultation?
Yes. Altman & Altman publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Altman & Altman have offices?
Altman & Altman publishes three offices, in Cambridge, Boston and Needham. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Altman & Altman?
Altman & Altman names nine attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Massachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Altman & Altman?
Altman & Altman scores 49 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.