- Home
- Houston, TX
- Personal Injury
- Amaro Law Firm
Amaro Law Firm
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryHouston, TX● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
6Practice areas
About Amaro Law Firm
Amaro Law Firm works from East T C Jester Boulevard in Houston, with a second office in Sugar Land, and names 15 attorneys.
3,856 reviews at 4.91 across two listings. Contingency fees and a free consultation, published. It publishes six case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
3,856 client reviews
Counted across 2 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.91 average over 3,856 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
62out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).
LFL Verified 20263 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (76% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · E4 Availability: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity on the Texas list of active franchise taxpayers. Texas does not require a sole proprietorship or a general partnership to pay franchise tax, and an exempt entity is left off as well, so this is a check this source cannot complete rather than evidence against the firm. The state's own SOSDirect service can settle it for a fee
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 15 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint3,856 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2008-07-01, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of State Bar of Texas, American Bar Association, Texas Trial Lawyers Association and 2 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes6/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted6 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience20/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved3,856 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.91 over 3,856 reviews → Bayesian 4.91 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle8 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-28) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 39 → 85th pct of 74-firm cohort (median 19) 3/3 · 2,634 referring domains, 97th pct 2/2 · 818 organic keywords / 6,513 visits·mo, 90th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness3/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Houston Personal Injury (100 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
39· 64th percentile
2,634 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 1.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26Trust pages
3 / 3
blog · attorney bios · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 35
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-23Practice areas 6 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Amaro Law Firm lists 6 case results on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathworkplacepedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 15 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 3,856 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 2 locations · main office: Houston
Houston2500 E T C Jester Blvd, Houston, TX 77008, USA
Sugar Land322 Brooks St, Sugar Land, TX 77478, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Amaro Law Firm charge?
Amaro Law Firm publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Amaro Law Firm offer a free consultation?
Yes. Amaro Law Firm publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Amaro Law Firm have offices?
Amaro Law Firm publishes two offices, in Houston and Sugar Land. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Amaro Law Firm?
Amaro Law Firm names 15 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Amaro Law Firm publishes verified?
No. Amaro Law Firm publishes six case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Amaro Law Firm?
Amaro Law Firm scores 61 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.