- Home
- San Diego, CA
- Personal Injury
- Amerberg Law Group
Amerberg Law Group
ListedPersonal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
Contingency
We operate on a contingency basis, which means you pay no fees until we win your case.
FreeInitial consultation
7Practice areas
About Amerberg Law Group
Amerberg Law Group works from Warner Center Lane in Woodland Hills, with a second office in San Diego, and names no attorney on the pages we could reach.
299 reviews at 4.26 across two listings. Contingency fees and a free consultation, published. It publishes none of the trust pages pillar D looks for.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
Fee terms published
We operate on a contingency basis, which means you pay no fees until we win your case.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
37out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 63 of the 70 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 30 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
28 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (32% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNo answer in the recordThis firm names no attorney on its own site, so there is no licence to look up. The State Bar of California does publish a register we can query; it was not the obstacle.
G2 DisciplineNo answer in the recordWith no attorney named, there is no disciplinary record to look up either.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint299 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2017-12-01, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is no admission year to establish for anybody. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience12/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved299 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.26 over 299 reviews → Bayesian 4.40 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only3 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle10 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-02) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle4 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them0 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority6/25
D1 Website trust & experiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 19 → 58th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 2/3 · 847 referring domains, 29th pct 1/2 · 13 organic keywords / 191 visits·mo, 37th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness5/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “We operate on a contingency basis, which means you pay no fees until we win your case.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
19· 56th percentile
847 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 9.4M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 62
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 7 areas · primary focus highlighted
Client reviews
4.3
★★★★★
Based on 299 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 2 locations · main office: Woodland Hills
Woodland Hills20970 Warner Center Ln # B, Woodland Hills, CA 91367, USA
San Diego8989 Rio San Diego Dr Ste 160, San Diego, CA 92108, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Amerberg Law Group charge?
Amerberg Law Group publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Amerberg Law Group offer a free consultation?
Yes. Amerberg Law Group publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Amerberg Law Group have offices?
Amerberg Law Group publishes two offices, in Woodland Hills and San Diego. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Amerberg Law Group?
Amerberg Law Group names no attorney on the public pages we could read. That is a gap in what the firm publishes rather than a statement about who works there, and it is why the licensure and discipline checks on this profile have nothing to run against.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Amerberg Law Group?
Amerberg Law Group scores 37 and sits at Listed. Passed: footprint. Did not pass: website. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.