- Home
- Dallas, TX
- Personal Injury
- Anderson Injury Lawyers
Anderson Injury Lawyers
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 75Personal InjuryDallas, TX● Accepting new clients
Contingency
We offer a free consultation and you pay nothing unless we win.
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas
About Anderson Injury Lawyers
Anderson Injury Lawyers says it was founded in 2007 and serves Dallas and the wider metroplex, with verified offices in Dallas, two in Fort Worth and one in Austin. Its own structured data leads with Dallas.
It is one of the few firms in this market that publishes a fee statement rather than only a promise, and one of two whose site passes Core Web Vitals outright. Its team page names nobody a person could check, which is what G5 asks for and why that gate does not pass.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 75 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
505 client reviews
Counted across 1 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.9 average over 505 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
We offer a free consultation and you pay nothing unless we win.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
36 results published
Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
75out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 20263 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (74% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity on the Texas list of active franchise taxpayers. Texas does not require a sole proprietorship or a general partnership to pay franchise tax, and an exempt entity is left off as well, so this is a check this source cannot complete rather than evidence against the firm. The state's own SOSDirect service can settle it for a fee
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 16 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint2,278 public client reviews across 4 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2006-08-22, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted36 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved505 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 505 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-28) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority14/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pass · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 48 → 97th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 37) 3/3 · 1,270 referring domains, 84th pct 2/2 · 459 organic keywords / 6,567 visits·mo, 84th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness9/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “We offer a free consultation and you pay nothing unless we win.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Dallas x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
48· 97th percentile
1,270 ref. domains · cohort median 37 · Ahrefs rank 0.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
5 / 5
attorney bios · blog · fee statement · disclaimer · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Passmobile
Performance 100
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Anderson Injury Lawyers lists 36 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathworkplacepedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 12 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Texas attorney register · 4 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
MA
Mark A. AndersonAttorney
JJ
John M. Groce Jr.Attorney
RS
Rachael StevensonAttorney
CM
Cole McNielAttorney
AI
Ana IslasAttorney
AE
Andrew EtterAttorney
CP
Chase PriceAttorney
JF
Josh FrechetteAttorney
BC
Bailey CurrieAttorney
BB
Brian BurkhardtAttorney
AC
Anna Lauren CashAttorney
JM
Joseph MilenskyAttorney
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 505 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 4 locations · main office: Fort Worth
Fort Worth1310 W El Paso St, Fort Worth, TX 76102, USA
Austin811 Nueces St, Austin, TX 78701, USA
Dallas408 W Eighth St #202, Dallas, TX 75208, USA
Fort Worth6618 Fossil Bluff Dr #108, Fort Worth, TX 76137, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Anderson Injury Lawyers charge?
Anderson Injury Lawyers publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Anderson Injury Lawyers offer a free consultation?
Yes. Anderson Injury Lawyers publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Anderson Injury Lawyers have offices?
Anderson Injury Lawyers publishes four offices, among them Fort Worth, Austin and Dallas. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Anderson Injury Lawyers?
Anderson Injury Lawyers names 16 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Anderson Injury Lawyers publishes verified?
No. Anderson Injury Lawyers publishes 36 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Anderson Injury Lawyers?
Anderson Injury Lawyers scores 73 and sits at Certified. Passed: website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.