ListedPersonal InjuryDallas, TX● Accepting new clients
★★★★★4.9 · 2,278 Google reviews4 offices0 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyWe offer a free consultation and you pay nothing unless we win.
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
1Practice areas
About Anderson Injury Lawyers
Anderson Injury Lawyers says it was founded in 2007 and serves Dallas and the wider metroplex, with verified offices in Dallas, two in Fort Worth and one in Austin. Its own structured data leads with Dallas.
It is one of the few firms in this market that publishes a fee statement rather than only a promise, and one of two whose site passes Core Web Vitals outright. Its team page names nobody a person could check, which is what G5 asks for and why that gate does not pass.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
2,278 client reviews
Counted across 4 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.91 average over 2,278 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
We offer a free consultation and you pay nothing unless we win.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
36 results published
Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
67out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 100 points this firm's state lets anyone measure. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (76% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: not yet measured (9 pts) · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by TX4 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. We read the Active Franchise Taxpayers (data.texas.gov 9cir-efmm), published as open data by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, which carries the Secretary of State file number, charter date and status and could not identify this firm in it: no entity whose name contains the firm's name. A miss there is not evidence that the firm is unregistered, so this gate is unresolved rather than failed. The franchise tax does not reach a sole proprietorship or a general partnership, so this register can confirm an entity and cannot rule one out.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint2,278 public client reviews across 4 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2006-08-22, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityPendingNo attorney is named on the site we could read0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted36 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which the New York advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience
20/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved2,278 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 4 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.91 over 2,278 reviews → Bayesian 4.91 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle20 of 20 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-28) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 20 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
14/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pass · no bar numbers on bios · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content5 / 7
D3 Local presenceGoogle4 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · We offer a free consultation and you pay nothing unless we win. · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Dallas x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Anderson Injury Lawyers lists 36 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 2,278 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 4 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 4 locations · main office: Fort Worth
Fort Worth1310 W El Paso St, Fort Worth, TX 76102, USA
Austin811 Nueces St, Austin, TX 78701, USA
Dallas408 W Eighth St #202, Dallas, TX 75208, USA
Fort Worth6618 Fossil Bluff Dr #108, Fort Worth, TX 76137, USA
