1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Antaramian Law, APC

Antaramian Law, APC

ListedPersonal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 72 Google reviews1 office0 attorneysEnglish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
7Practice areas

About Antaramian Law, APC

Antaramian Law, APC is a personal injury firm with a single office in Glendale.

The firm states that the first consultation is free; its intake line is open around the clock. It does not state a fee model on its public pages, so none is recorded here.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

51out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 53 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Listed

1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar B in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

Certified needs more measured
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (70% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: not yet measured (6 pts) · B2 Specificity: not yet measured (5 pts) · B3 Results disclosure: not yet measured (4 pts)
G1 LicensureNo answer in the recordThis firm names no attorney on its own site, so there is no licence to look up. The State Bar of California does publish a register we can query; it was not the obstacle.
G2 DisciplineNo answer in the recordWith no attorney named, there is no disciplinary record to look up either.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint72 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2023-03-24, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is no admission year to establish for anybody. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedPendingthe results page served 1804 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 6
B2 SpecificityPendingthe results page served 1804 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 5
B3 Results disclosurePendingthe results page served 1804 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved72 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 72 reviews → Bayesian 4.90 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle4 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-03) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 1.9 → 19th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 1/3 · 1,806 referring domains, 90th pct 2/2 · 5 organic keywords / 9 visits·mo, 22th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 6 photos · 6 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.6 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
4/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
1.9· 19th percentile
1,806 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 48.3M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
4 / 4
disclaimer · privacy policy · fee statement · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 46
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 72 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Glendale

Glendale450 N Brand Blvd Ste 600, Glendale, CA 91203, USA