1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Aramayo and Ho, APC

Aramayo and Ho, APC

ListedPersonal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 63 Google reviews1 office4 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
PaidInitial consultation
4Practice areas

About Aramayo and Ho, APC

Aramayo and Ho, APC is a personal injury firm with a single office in Glendale.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

31out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Listed

1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

34 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (39% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +8 available · D2 Search authority: +7 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 Licensure1 of 4 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 3 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo answer in the recordNo disciplinary record is held against any of the 1 attorneys we identified. Victor Ho could not be told apart from 8 namesakes, one of whom is not eligible to practise. Held open.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 4 named attorneys published.
G6 FootprintNot checked63 public reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum; time in operation still to confirm
Professional Standing
6/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 5.0 years since admission across 1 of 4 named attorneys (longest 5, shortest 5) · NYS Attorney Registration database5 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry1 of 4 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio1 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved63 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 63 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-27) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
3/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 0.9 → 12th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 0/3 · 1,053 referring domains, 38th pct 1/2 · 1 organic keywords / 28 visits·mo, 21th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)1 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 2 photos · 4 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.2 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
2/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedContingency · the fee percentage itself is not published2 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
0.9· 12th percentile
1,053 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 60.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
2 / 2
attorney bios · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 82
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Practice areas 4 areas · primary focus highlighted

Personal InjuryCar AccidentsWrongful DeathSlip and Fall

Attorneys 1 attorney · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 3 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

CA
Charles B. AramayoAdmitted in CA

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 63 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Glendale

Glendale201 N Brand Blvd Ste 200, Glendale, CA 91206, USA