1. Home
  2. Houston, TX
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Armstrong Lee & Baker LLP

Armstrong Lee & Baker LLP

LFL Certified 2026 · Score 75Personal InjuryHouston, TX● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 305 Google reviews2 offices29 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyWe operate on a contingency fee basis , meaning we only get paid when we win your case.
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
6Practice areas

About Armstrong Lee & Baker

Armstrong Lee & Baker works from North Loop West in Houston, with a second office in Dallas, and names 31 attorneys.

305 reviews at 4.9 across two listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes eleven case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Certified 2026

Scored 75 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.

305 client reviews

Counted across 2 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.9 average over 305 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Fee terms published

We operate on a contingency fee basis , meaning we only get paid when we win your case.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

11 results published

Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

75out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

LFL Certified

3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).

LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 2026
3 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (88% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +3.5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeARMSTRONG LEE & BAKER LLP holds an active franchise tax responsibility in Texas with the right to transact business, and 2 Google-verified locations. Identified because the name matches, at an address we verified
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 29 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint305 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2021-12-04, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of State Bar of Texas · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted11 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved305 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 305 reviews → Bayesian 4.88 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle9 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-21) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pending · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 30 → 71th pct of 74-firm cohort (median 19) 2/3 · 1,604 referring domains, 84th pct 2/2 · 312 organic keywords / 1,081 visits·mo, 68th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
9/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “We operate on a contingency fee basis , meaning we only get paid when we win your case.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Houston Personal Injury (100 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
30· 53th percentile
1,604 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 3.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Not measuredmobile
PageSpeed Insights measurement pending
Pending

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Armstrong Lee & Baker LLP lists 11 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplacepedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 29 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 305 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Houston

Houston2800 N Loop W #900, Houston, TX 77092, USA
Armstrong Lee & Baker: Personal Injury Lawyer Dallas5646 Milton St Ste. 415, Dallas, TX 75206, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Armstrong Lee & Baker charge?
Armstrong Lee & Baker publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Armstrong Lee & Baker offer a free consultation?
Yes. Armstrong Lee & Baker publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Armstrong Lee & Baker have offices?
Armstrong Lee & Baker publishes two offices, in Houston and Dallas. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Armstrong Lee & Baker?
Armstrong Lee & Baker names 31 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Armstrong Lee & Baker publishes verified?
No. Armstrong Lee & Baker publishes eleven case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Armstrong Lee & Baker?
Armstrong Lee & Baker scores 73 and sits at Certified. Passed: entity registration, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.