- Home
- Baltimore, MD
- Personal Injury
- Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin, L.L.C.
Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin, L.L.C.
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryBaltimore, MD● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
PaidInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin, L.L.C.
Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin works from Reisterstown Road and names six attorneys.
25 reviews at 4.83 across two listings. It publishes nothing we could record about fees, consultations or the hours it answers. It publishes nine case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2614 published discipline decisions of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, 1976 to 2026. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
45out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Maryland does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar E (0/15).
LFL Verified 202620 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (67% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MDMaryland does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2614 published discipline decisions of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, 1976 to 2026. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MD1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Maryland publishes no business register we can query. SDAT's entity search is a form rather than a dataset, its bulk data is sold rather than published, and the state's open data portal carries a count of businesses instead of the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 6 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint19 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2021-04-06, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceMaryland publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMaryland publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of Maryland Association for Justice, American Association for Justice, Maryland State Bar Association and 4 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes10/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted9 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience12/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved25 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.83 over 25 reviews → Bayesian 4.83 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle2 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2025-11-18) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority5/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · no fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 13 → 31th pct of 26-firm cohort (median 19) 1/3 · 540 referring domains, 31th pct 1/2 · 67 organic keywords / 326 visits·mo, 31th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 3 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.3 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness0/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedfee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published0 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Maryland x Personal Injury (27 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
13· 31th percentile
540 ref. domains · cohort median 19 · Ahrefs rank 14.1M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · disclaimer · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 59
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-10Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin, L.L.C. lists 9 case results on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehiclepremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 6 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.8
★★★★★
Based on 25 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Moore & Quinn, LLC
Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Moore & Quinn, LLC1829 Reisterstown Rd Ste. 200, Baltimore, MD 21208, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin charge?
Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee.
Does Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin offer a free consultation?
Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin does not publish a free consultation on the pages we read. That is not the same as charging for one, and it is worth asking.
Where does Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin have offices?
Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin publishes one office, in Baltimore. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin?
Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin names six attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Maryland does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin publishes verified?
No. Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin publishes nine case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin?
Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin scores 44 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.