1. Home
  2. Baltimore, MD
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Bob Katz Law

Bob Katz Law

ListedPersonal InjuryBaltimore, MD● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 329 Google reviews3 offices0 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
7Practice areas

About Bob Katz Law

Bob Katz Law works from Ellicott Mills Drive in Ellicott City, with offices in Baltimore and Fairfax, and names no attorney on the pages we could reach.

329 reviews at 4.92 across three listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes six case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

329 client reviews

Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.92 average over 329 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

68out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Maryland does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Listed

1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).

10 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (84% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +4.0 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MDMaryland does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorneys publishedThis firm names no attorney on the pages we could read, so there is nobody to look up. The register itself exists: Maryland publishes its attorney discipline as court decisions and we read them for the other firms in this market.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MD3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Maryland publishes no business register we can query. SDAT's entity search is a form rather than a dataset, its bulk data is sold rather than published, and the state's open data portal carries a count of businesses instead of the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint328 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2006-03-02, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceMaryland publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice, Maryland State Bar Association, Maryland Association for Justice · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
10/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted6 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved329 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.92 over 329 reviews → Bayesian 4.90 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle12 of 15 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-14) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 15 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 22 → 60th pct of 26-firm cohort (median 19) 2/3 · 758 referring domains, 73th pct 1/2 · 276 organic keywords / 706 visits·mo, 54th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Maryland x Personal Injury (27 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
22· 60th percentile
758 ref. domains · cohort median 19 · Ahrefs rank 7.5M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
2 / 2
attorney bios · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 34
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-14

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Bob Katz Law lists 6 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 329 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 3 locations · main office: Ellicott City

Ellicott City3505 Ellicott Mills Dr # C1, Ellicott City, MD 21043, USA
Baltimore1001 Fleet St Ste 525, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA
Fairfax10560 Main St Unit 318, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Bob Katz Law charge?
Bob Katz Law publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Bob Katz Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. Bob Katz Law publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Bob Katz Law have offices?
Bob Katz Law publishes three offices, in Ellicott City, Baltimore and Fairfax. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Bob Katz Law?
Bob Katz Law names no attorney on the public pages we could read. That is a gap in what the firm publishes rather than a statement about who works there, and it is why the licensure and discipline checks on this profile have nothing to run against.
Are the case results Bob Katz Law publishes verified?
No. Bob Katz Law publishes six case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Bob Katz Law?
Bob Katz Law scores 66 and sits at Listed. Passed: footprint. Did not pass: website. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.