1. Home
  2. San Antonio, TX
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Brylak Law

Brylak Law

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Antonio, TX● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 645 Google reviews2 offices6 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
7Practice areas

About Brylak Law

Brylak Law works from Anthem Parkway in San Antonio, with a second office in Colorado Springs, and names eight attorneys.

645 reviews at 4.93 across two listings. Contingency fees and a free consultation, published. It publishes eleven case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

645 client reviews

Counted across 2 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.93 average over 645 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

11 results published

Across 5 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

60out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).

LFL Verified 2026
5 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (80% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity on the Texas list of active franchise taxpayers. Texas does not require a sole proprietorship or a general partnership to pay franchise tax, and an exempt entity is left off as well, so this is a check this source cannot complete rather than evidence against the firm. The state's own SOSDirect service can settle it for a fee
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 7 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint645 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2005-07-19, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of State Bar of Texas, Texas Trial Lawyers Association, American Board of Trial Advocates · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
8/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted11 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted5 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
20/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved645 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.93 over 645 reviews → Bayesian 4.92 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle10 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-01) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 13 → 43th pct of 63-firm cohort (median 17.5) 1/3 · 1,112 referring domains, 67th pct 1/2 · 155 organic keywords / 2,725 visits·mo, 70th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
3/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Antonio Personal Injury (64 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
13· 43th percentile
1,112 ref. domains · cohort median 17.5 · Ahrefs rank 13.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
3 / 3
privacy policy · blog · disclaimer
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 74
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-29

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Brylak Law lists 11 case results on its own website, across 5 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 6 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 645 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: San Antonio

San Antonio15727 Anthem Pkwy #510, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
Colorado Springs2 N Cascade Ave Ste. 1120, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Brylak Law charge?
Brylak Law publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Brylak Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. Brylak Law publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Brylak Law have offices?
Brylak Law publishes two offices, in San Antonio and Colorado Springs. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Brylak Law?
Brylak Law names eight attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Brylak Law publishes verified?
No. Brylak Law publishes eleven case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Brylak Law?
Brylak Law scores 58 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.