- Home
- New York, NY
- Personal Injury
- Caesar, Napoli & Spivak
【C
Caesar, Napoli & Spivak
ListedPersonal InjuryNew York, NY● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
PaidInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Caesar, Napoli & Spivak
Caesar, Napoli & Spivak works from Broadway in Manhattan and names no attorney on the pages we could reach.
291 reviews at 4.9. Pages in Chinese, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
4.9 average over 291 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Chinese
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
42out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 65 of the 71 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 29 of them need a register that New York does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2) and do not count against the firm. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
Certified needs more measured
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (60% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A5 Accountability: not yet measured (6 pts) · A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available
G1 LicensureNo attorneys publishedThis firm names no attorney on its public pages, so there is no roster whose licensure can be checked. The register is open and free to search; the names are what is missing.
G2 DisciplineNo attorneys publishedThis firm names no attorney on its public pages, so there is no roster whose disciplinary history can be checked. The register is open and free to search; the names are what is missing.
G3 Entity & officeCAESAR, NAPOLI & SPIVAK PLLC is an active domestic professional service limited liability company registered since 2022-02-09, with 1 Google-verified location
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint291 public client reviews and 5 years since the entity was formed in 2022
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is no admission year to establish for anybody. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityPendingNothing published about insurance or bar memberships0 / 6
BPublished Outcomes3/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted1 result published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts1 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; 8 court or county references2 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which New York's advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved291 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 291 reviews → Bayesian 4.88 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-16) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority5/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-05DR 3.4 → 9th pct of 79-firm cohort (median 27.5) 0/3 · 1,018 referring domains, 71th pct 1/2 · 21 organic keywords / 91 visits·mo, 18th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)1 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-05no JSON-LD detected 0/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)0 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness2/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedfee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published0 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Chinese1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: New York × Personal Injury (81 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
3.4· 9th percentile
1,018 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 36.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-05Trust pages
5 / 5
disclaimer · attorney bios · privacy policy · fee statement · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 54
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-22Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Caesar, Napoli & Spivak lists 1 case result on its own website. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 291 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Manhattan
Manhattan233 Broadway #2348, New York, NY 10279, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Caesar, Napoli & Spivak charge?
Caesar, Napoli & Spivak publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee.
Does Caesar, Napoli & Spivak offer a free consultation?
Caesar, Napoli & Spivak does not publish a free consultation on the pages we read. That is not the same as charging for one, and it is worth asking. It publishes material in Chinese.
Where does Caesar, Napoli & Spivak have offices?
Caesar, Napoli & Spivak publishes one office, in Manhattan. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Caesar, Napoli & Spivak?
Caesar, Napoli & Spivak names no attorney on the public pages we could read. That is a gap in what the firm publishes rather than a statement about who works there, and it is why the licensure and discipline checks on this profile have nothing to run against.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Caesar, Napoli & Spivak?
Caesar, Napoli & Spivak scores 45 and sits at Listed. Passed: entity registration and footprint. Did not pass: website. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.