1. Home
  2. New York, NY
  3. Family Law
  4. Cedeño Law Group, PLLC

Cedeño Law Group, PLLC

LFL Verified 2026Family LawNew York, NY● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.7 · 168 Google reviews1 office3 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
Not statedFee model
PaidInitial consultation
1Practice areas

About Cedeño Law Group

Cedeño Law Group works from Broadway and names three people, among them Peter L. Cedeño. It publishes in Spanish and says it does collaborative divorce as well as litigation.

168 reviews at 4.7. It names one stage of a matrimonial case, which is the thinnest explanation in this ranking, and publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer. Its largest contentful paint on mobile is 10.3 seconds.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

None of the 2 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.

4.7 average over 168 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

43out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that New York does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (2/15).

LFL Verified 2026
22 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (53% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +6 available · B1 Fee terms published: +6 available · D2 Search authority: +6 available
G1 Licensure2 of 3 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status. 1 could not be told apart from namesakes in the register and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNone of the 2 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity found in the active corporations register. New York does not require a general partnership to file with the Department of State, so this is not evidence against the firm, only a check we could not complete from this source
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 3 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint168 public client reviews and 15 years since its web address was registered in 2011
Professional Standing
13/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 11.5 years since admission across 2 of 3 named attorneys (longest 14, shortest 9) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry2 of 3 named attorneys matched to the New York register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of New York State Bar Association, Brooklyn Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
2/15
B1 Fee terms publishedFirm-submittedNothing about the rate, the retainer or any other price on the 2 pages we read. The court rules guarantee a client all of it in a signed agreement before the work starts; publishing it beforehand is the firm's choice0 / 6
B2 The case explainedFirm-submittedExplains 1 stage of a matrimonial case: maintenance · names collaborative, litigation2 / 5
B3 Billing and the retainer disclosedFirm-submittedSays nothing about how it bills against the retainer or what happens to the unused part, on any of the 2 pages we read0 / 4
CClient Experience
15/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved168 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.7 over 168 reviews → Bayesian 4.75 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-05-19) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them2 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-17DR 7 → 41th pct of 17-firm cohort (median 8) 1/3 · 669 referring domains, 71th pct 1/2 · 30 organic keywords / 115 visits·mo, 24th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-17JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
2/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedfee model not published · the rate, retainer or flat fee itself is not published0 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: New York × Family Law (18 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
7· 41th percentile
669 ref. domains · cohort median 8 · Ahrefs rank 22.4M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-17
Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · blog · disclaimer · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 57
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-17

Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted

Family Law

Attorneys 2 attorneys · every licence checked against the New York attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

AF
Anna FeldbergAdmitted in NY
SS
Sandra SpennatoAdmitted in NY

Also named by the firm

The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.7
★★★★★
Based on 168 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Manhattan

Manhattan111 Broadway Ste 811, New York, NY 10006, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Cedeño Law Group charge?
Cedeño Law Group publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee.
Does Cedeño Law Group offer a free consultation?
Cedeño Law Group does not publish a free consultation on the pages we read. That is not the same as charging for one, and it is worth asking. It publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Cedeño Law Group have offices?
Cedeño Law Group publishes one office, in Manhattan. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Cedeño Law Group?
Cedeño Law Group names three attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. 2 of 3 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status. 1 could not be told apart from namesakes in the register and are counted neither way.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Cedeño Law Group?
Cedeño Law Group scores 42 and sits at Verified. Passed: licensure, discipline, website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.