- Home
- Philadelphia, PA
- Personal Injury
- Chermol & Fishman, LLC
Chermol & Fishman, LLC
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPhiladelphia, PA● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
2Practice areas
About Chermol & Fishman
Chermol & Fishman works from Bustleton Avenue in Philadelphia, with offices in Cherry Hill Township and Flower Mound, and names twelve attorneys.
978 reviews at 4.9 across three listings. A free consultation, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2173 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on the discipline of members of the Pennsylvania bar, prosecuted by its Disciplinary Board, 1976 to 2019. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
978 client reviews
Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.9 average over 978 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
41out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Pennsylvania does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 202624 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (50% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by PAPennsylvania does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2173 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on the discipline of members of the Pennsylvania bar, prosecuted by its Disciplinary Board, 1976 to 2019. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by PA3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Pennsylvania publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 12 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint978 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2009-12-15, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourcePennsylvania publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourcePennsylvania publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved978 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 978 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle9 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-03) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 24 → 57th pct of 73-firm cohort (median 19) 2/3 · 723 referring domains, 12th pct 0/2 · 1,712 organic keywords / 5,695 visits·mo, 94th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 8 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness1/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Philadelphia Personal Injury (74 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
24· 57th percentile
723 ref. domains · cohort median 19 · Ahrefs rank 6.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 68
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26Practice areas 2 areas · primary focus highlighted
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 11 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 978 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 3 locations · main office: Philadelphia
Philadelphia11450 Bustleton Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19116, USA
Cherry Hill Township220 Lake Dr E #205, Cherry Hill Township, NJ 08002, USA
Flower Mound4105 Spring Meadow Ln, Flower Mound, TX 75028, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Chermol & Fishman charge?
Chermol & Fishman publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Chermol & Fishman offer a free consultation?
Yes. Chermol & Fishman publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Chermol & Fishman have offices?
Chermol & Fishman publishes three offices, in Philadelphia, Cherry Hill Township and Flower Mound. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Chermol & Fishman?
Chermol & Fishman names twelve attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Pennsylvania does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Chermol & Fishman?
Chermol & Fishman scores 40 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.