- Home
- Phoenix, AZ
- Personal Injury
- Colburn Hintze Maletta, PLLC
Colburn Hintze Maletta, PLLC
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPhoenix, AZ● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
5Practice areas
About Colburn Hintze Maletta
Colburn Hintze Maletta works from East Highland Avenue and names three attorneys.
62 reviews at 5.0. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
49out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Arizona does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 202616 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (42% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B2 Specificity: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by AZArizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by AZArizona does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by AZ1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Arizona publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 1 named attorney published.
G6 Footprint62 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2013-09-18, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes4/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted4 results published on the firm's own site, counted from result headings3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted1 case type named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up1 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience12/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved62 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 62 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2024-07-28) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review1 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 21 → 58th pct of 100-firm cohort (median 16) 2/3 · 2,034 referring domains, 94th pct 2/2 · 344 organic keywords / 1,862 visits·mo, 79th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 5 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.5 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Phoenix Personal Injury (101 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
21· 58th percentile
2,034 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 8.0M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
3 / 3
privacy policy · blog · fee statement
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 54
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 5 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Colburn Hintze Maletta, PLLC lists 4 case results on its own website, across 1 case type. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
dwi
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 62 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: CHM Injury Attorneys
CHM Injury Attorneys2150 E Highland Ave #107, Phoenix, AZ 85016, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Colburn Hintze Maletta charge?
Colburn Hintze Maletta publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Colburn Hintze Maletta offer a free consultation?
Yes. Colburn Hintze Maletta publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Colburn Hintze Maletta have offices?
Colburn Hintze Maletta publishes one office, in Phoenix. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Colburn Hintze Maletta?
Colburn Hintze Maletta names three attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Arizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Colburn Hintze Maletta?
Colburn Hintze Maletta scores 53 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.