1. Home
  2. Portland, OR
  3. Personal Injury
  4. D'Amore Law Group

D'Amore Law Group

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPortland, OR● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 82 Google reviews6 offices19 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
1Practice areas

About D'Amore Law Group

D'Amore Law Group holds six verified offices, two in Portland and one each in Lake Oswego, Bend, Tacoma and Vancouver, and names twenty people. Its own description is of an Oregon and Washington practice.

Contingency fees, a free case evaluation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published, along with a statement that the firm covers case preparation costs and the client owes nothing if the case is lost. 82 reviews at 4.93.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 457 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Oregon on the conduct of Oregon State Bar members, 1951 to 2017. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

46out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Oregon does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (50% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by OROregon does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 457 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Oregon on the conduct of Oregon State Bar members, 1951 to 2017. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by OR6 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. We read the Active Businesses register (data.oregon.gov tckn-sxa6), published as open data by the Oregon Secretary of State and could not identify this firm in it: 1 entity name(s) contain the firm's name and none of them agrees on both the name and the city. A miss there is not evidence that the firm is unregistered, so this gate is unresolved rather than failed.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 19 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint82 public client reviews across 6 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 1998-11-30, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceOregon publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which the New York advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved82 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 6 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.93 over 82 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle8 of 16 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-10) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 16 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pending · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 32 → 82th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 24) 2/3 · 1,033 referring domains, 95th pct 2/2 · 921 organic keywords / 7,334 visits·mo, 100th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle6 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Portland x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
32· 82th percentile
1,033 ref. domains · cohort median 24 · Ahrefs rank 3.4M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy · disclaimer
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Not measuredmobile
PageSpeed Insights measurement pending
Pending

Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted

Personal Injury

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 19 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

  • Douglas Oh-Keith
  • Amy Bruning
  • Ben Turner
  • Savannah Stevens
  • Anna Brunkenhoefer
  • Matt D’Amore
  • Erin Mitchell
  • Amber Rysavy
  • Cary Breshears-Bean
  • Rachel Elder
  • Janelle McPoland
  • Lisa D’Amore
  • Trish Hickman
  • Shannon Ormsby
  • Colin Keys
  • Wimberley Marshall
  • Ashlyn Kawamata-Shoda
  • Nanette Cichon
  • Delia Caldwell

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 82 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 6 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 6 locations · main office: Portland

Portland1050 SW 6th Ave #1100, Portland, OR 97204, USA
Lake Oswego4230 Galewood St #200, Lake Oswego, OR 97035, USA
Tacoma5413 S Tacoma Way Suite D, Tacoma, WA 98409, USA
Vancouver1220 Main St Ste 400, Vancouver, WA 98660, USA
Bend750 NW Charbonneau St #201, Bend, OR 97701, USA
D'Amore Thomas506 SW 6th Ave, Portland, OR 97204, USA