- Home
- Portland, OR
- Personal Injury
- Eder Sturm Eder
Eder Sturm Eder
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPortland, OR● Accepting new clients
Contingency
For personal injury cases, we work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don't pay unless we win your case.
FreeInitial consultation
4Practice areas
About Eder Sturm Eder
Eder Sturm Eder says its attorneys have served Oregon for more than 30 years, and it answers the fee question with more care than most: the structure varies by the type of case, and injury work is contingent.
158 reviews at 4.9 from one Portland office. It names no attorney on the pages we could reach, although it publishes bios, so this is a limit of what a crawler could read rather than of what the firm publishes.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 457 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Oregon on the conduct of Oregon State Bar members, 1951 to 2017. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
4.9 average over 158 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
For personal injury cases, we work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don't pay unless we win your case.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
43out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Oregon does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G1) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).
LFL Verified 202622 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (55% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +8 available
G1 LicensureNot published by OROregon does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 457 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Oregon on the conduct of Oregon State Bar members, 1951 to 2017. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeEDER STURM EDER is registered with the Oregon Secretary of State, under number 105942197, since 2014-11-04, and 1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 1 named attorney published.
G6 Footprint158 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2025-05-08, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceOregon publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceOregon publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of Oregon State Bar, Oregon Trial Lawyers Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved158 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 158 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-05) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority3/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 4.3 → 16th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 24) 0/3 · 336 referring domains, 0th pct 0/2 · 11 organic keywords / 45 visits·mo, 11th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)0 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 6 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.6 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness5/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “For personal injury cases, we work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don't pay unless we win your case.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Portland x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
4.3· 16th percentile
336 ref. domains · cohort median 24 · Ahrefs rank 31.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
3 / 3
blog · attorney bios · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 53
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15Practice areas 4 areas · primary focus highlighted
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 158 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Portland
Portland278 SW Arthur St, Portland, OR 97201, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Eder Sturm Eder charge?
Eder Sturm Eder publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Eder Sturm Eder offer a free consultation?
Yes. Eder Sturm Eder publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Eder Sturm Eder have offices?
Eder Sturm Eder publishes one office, in Portland. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Eder Sturm Eder?
Eder Sturm Eder names one attorney on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Oregon does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Eder Sturm Eder?
Eder Sturm Eder scores 42 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, entity registration, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.