- Home
- Portland, OR
- Personal Injury
- Eder Sturm Eder
Eder Sturm Eder
ListedPersonal InjuryPortland, OR● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFor personal injury cases, we work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don't pay unless we win your case.
FreeInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Eder Sturm Eder
Eder Sturm Eder says its attorneys have served Oregon for more than 30 years, and it answers the fee question with more care than most: the structure varies by the type of case, and injury work is contingent.
158 reviews at 4.9 from one Portland office. It names no attorney on the pages we could reach, although it publishes bios, so this is a limit of what a crawler could read rather than of what the firm publishes.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
4.9 average over 158 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
For personal injury cases, we work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don't pay unless we win your case.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
34out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 100 points this firm's state lets anyone measure. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (47% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: not yet measured (9 pts) · D2 Search authority: +8 available
G1 LicensureNot published by OROregon does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by OROregon does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeEDER STURM EDER is registered with the Oregon Secretary of State, under number 105942197, since 2014-11-04, and 1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint158 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2025-05-08, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityPendingNo attorney is named on the site we could read0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which the New York advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved158 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 158 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-05) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority4/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content1.5 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 4.3 → 16th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 24) 0/3 · 336 referring domains, 0th pct 0/2 · 11 organic keywords / 45 visits·mo, 11th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)0 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness5/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · For personal injury cases, we work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don't pay unless we win your case. · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Portland x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
4.3· 16th percentile
336 ref. domains · cohort median 24 · Ahrefs rank 31.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
3 / 3
blog · attorney bios · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 53
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 158 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Portland
Portland278 SW Arthur St, Portland, OR 97201, USA