- Home
- Phoenix, AZ
- Personal Injury
- Feller & Wendt, LLC
Feller & Wendt, LLC
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 74Personal InjuryPhoenix, AZ● Accepting new clients
Contingency
At Feller & Wendt, LLC, our attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning we charge zero upfront fees.
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas
About Feller & Wendt
Feller & Wendt works from six offices across Utah, Arizona and Idaho, and names 14 attorneys.
1,554 reviews at 4.8 across six listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes 26 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 74 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
1,554 client reviews
Counted across 6 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.8 average over 1,554 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
At Feller & Wendt, LLC, our attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning we charge zero upfront fees.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
26 results published
Across 7 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
74out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Arizona does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 20264 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (79% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by AZArizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by AZArizona does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by AZ6 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Arizona publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 14 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint1,554 public client reviews across 6 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2010-01-13, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Bar Association, Lake County Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted26 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved1,554 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 6 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.8 over 1,554 reviews → Bayesian 4.80 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle27 of 30 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-10) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 30 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority11/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 38 → 90th pct of 100-firm cohort (median 16) 3/3 · 1,248 referring domains, 72th pct 1/2 · 365 organic keywords / 4,685 visits·mo, 84th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle6 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness9/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “At Feller & Wendt, LLC, our attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning we charge zero upfront fees.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Phoenix Personal Injury (101 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
38· 90th percentile
1,248 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 2.0M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
5 / 5
privacy policy · disclaimer · fee statement · attorney bios · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 47
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Feller & Wendt, LLC lists 26 case results on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 14 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.8
★★★★★
Based on 1,554 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 6 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 6 locations · main office: Feller & Wendt Personal Injury Attorneys
Feller & Wendt Personal Injury Attorneys67 S Main St #100, Layton, UT 84041, USA
Mesa2222 S Dobson Rd #500, Mesa, AZ 85202, USA
Phoenix1 N 1st St Ste 7550, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
Millcreek4424 S 700 E #240, Millcreek, UT 84107, USA
St. George169 W 2710 S Cir Suite 202-A, St. George, UT 84790, USA
Feller & Wendt Personal Injury Attorneys5536 N Eagle Rd, Boise, ID 83713, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Feller & Wendt charge?
Feller & Wendt publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Feller & Wendt offer a free consultation?
Yes. Feller & Wendt publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Feller & Wendt have offices?
Feller & Wendt publishes six offices, among them Layton, Mesa, Phoenix and Millcreek. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Feller & Wendt?
Feller & Wendt names 14 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Arizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Feller & Wendt publishes verified?
No. Feller & Wendt publishes 26 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Feller & Wendt?
Feller & Wendt scores 71 and sits at Certified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.