1. Home
  2. Boston, MA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Fiorentino Legal, PC

Fiorentino Legal, PC

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 117 Google reviews1 office1 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
6Practice areas

About Fiorentino Legal

Fiorentino Legal works from Furnace Brook Parkway in Quincy and publishes both injury and criminal defence work, with a contingency fee, a free consultation and a 24 hour line.

Its Google listing averages a flat five stars across 117 reviews. It names no attorney on the pages we could reach, which is the gate G5 asks about.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

5 average over 117 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

44out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Massachusetts does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).

LFL Verified 2026
21 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (55% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +8 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorneys publishedThis firm names no attorney on the pages we could read, so there is nobody to look up. The register itself exists: Massachusetts publishes its attorney discipline as court decisions and we read them for the other firms in this market.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 1 named attorney published.
G6 Footprint117 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2018-11-24, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of Massachusetts Bar Association, Massachusetts Academy of Trial Attorneys · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved117 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 117 reviews → Bayesian 4.92 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-19) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
3/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 0.3 → 0th pct of 27-firm cohort (median 20) 0/3 · 478 referring domains, 19th pct 0/2 · 33 organic keywords / 46 visits·mo, 13th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)0 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 8 photos · 7 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.8 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Boston x Personal Injury (28 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
0.3· 0th percentile
478 ref. domains · cohort median 20 · Ahrefs rank 74.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
2 / 2
privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 80
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 117 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Quincy

Quincy1266 Furnace Brook Pkwy Suite 400, Quincy, MA 02169, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Fiorentino Legal charge?
Fiorentino Legal publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Fiorentino Legal offer a free consultation?
Yes. Fiorentino Legal publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Fiorentino Legal have offices?
Fiorentino Legal publishes one office, in Quincy. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Fiorentino Legal?
Fiorentino Legal names no attorney on the public pages we could read. That is a gap in what the firm publishes rather than a statement about who works there, and it is why the licensure and discipline checks on this profile have nothing to run against.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Fiorentino Legal?
Fiorentino Legal scores 43 and sits at Listed. Passed: footprint. Did not pass: website. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.