Foti Law

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients

★★★★★ 5.0 · 265 Google reviews1 office2 attorneysEnglish

ContingencyFee model

FreeInitial consultation

24/7intake line

1Practice areas

About Foti Law

Foti Law works from Pleasant Street in Malden and names two attorneys. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published, with every trust page pillar D looks for.

Its Google listing averages a flat five stars across 265 reviews.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

5 average over 265 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

45out of 100

LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 63 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Massachusetts does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillars A and B in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026

Certified needs more measured

70 needed · A+B+C floor met (83% of the A, B and C points assessed)

Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · B1 Results published: not yet measured (6 pts) · B2 Specificity: not yet measured (5 pts)

G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.

G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.

G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 2 named attorneys published.

G6 Footprint265 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2019-05-08, so it has been operating for more than a year

AProfessional Standing

0/25

A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10

A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9

A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3

BPublished Outcomes

0/15

B1 Results publishedPendingthe results page served 1512 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 6

B2 SpecificityPendingthe results page served 1512 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 5

B3 Results disclosurePendingthe results page served 1512 characters of text and no figure or mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so there was nothing on it to count. Whether the results are held back from the served HTML or the page carries none is not something this check can tell.0 / 4

CClient Experience

19/20

C1 Authentic volumeObserved265 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5

C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 265 reviews → Bayesian 4.95 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6

C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-28) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5

C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4

DDigital Presence & Authority

4/25

D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7

D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 2.7 → 4th pct of 27-firm cohort (median 20) 0/3 · 397 referring domains, 0th pct 0/2 · 8 organic keywords / 24 visits·mo, 2th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)0 / 8

D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5

D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5

EAccess & Responsiveness

6/15

E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6

E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4

E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5

Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Boston x Personal Injury (28 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority

2.7· 4th percentile

397 ref. domains · cohort median 20 · Ahrefs rank 40.4M

Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16

Trust pages

4 / 4

Observed

Core Web Vitals

Failmobile

Performance 44

Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15

Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted

Personal Injury

Attorneys 2 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Massachusetts attorney register

Zachary D. MargulesOf Counsel

Matthew M. FotiPrincipal Attorney

Client reviews

5.0

★★★★★

Based on 265 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Matthew Foti Injury Lawyers

Matthew Foti Injury Lawyers380 Pleasant St Ste 14, Malden, MA 02148, USA