- Home
- Buffalo, NY
- Family Law
- Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law
Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law
LFL Verified 2026Family LawBuffalo, NY● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
PaidInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law
Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law works from Eggert Road in Amherst and titles his site for divorce and family law. His own profile page gives his admission to the New York State courts in 1986, and it is the only admission year any firm in this ranking publishes.
14 reviews at 4.2. This firm's Google listing is under his own name rather than the initials his website uses, and searching for the website's name returned a criminal defence practice in another state, so his profile was briefly measured as having no Google presence at all. He explains one stage of a matrimonial case, describes no route through one, and publishes no fee.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
None of the 1 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
40 years average at the bar
Mean 40.0 years since admission across 1 of 1 named attorneys (longest 40, shortest 40) · NYS Attorney Registration database
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
42out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that New York does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: A; most headroom in pillar E (0/15).
LFL Verified 202623 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (52% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Fee terms published: +6 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +6 available · E4 Availability: +5 available
G1 Licensure1 of 1 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status
G2 DisciplineNone of the 1 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity found in the active corporations register. New York does not require a general partnership to file with the Department of State, so this is not evidence against the firm, only a check we could not complete from this source
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 1 named attorney published.
G6 Footprint14 public client reviews and 11 years since its web address was registered in 2015
AProfessional Standing19/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 40.0 years since admission across 1 of 1 named attorneys (longest 40, shortest 40) · NYS Attorney Registration database10 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry1 of 1 named attorneys matched to the New York register; bar numbers published on the bios9 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes1/15
B1 Fee terms publishedFirm-submittedNothing about the rate, the retainer or any other price on the 3 pages we read. The court rules guarantee a client all of it in a signed agreement before the work starts; publishing it beforehand is the firm's choice0 / 6
B2 The case explainedFirm-submittedExplains 1 stage of a matrimonial case: equitable distribution · names no route through it1 / 5
B3 Billing and the retainer disclosedFirm-submittedSays nothing about how it bills against the retainer or what happens to the unused part, on any of the 3 pages we read0 / 4
CClient Experience10/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved14 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count1 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.2 over 14 reviews → Bayesian 4.75 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle1 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-13) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them2 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-18DR 4.2 → 87th pct of 23-firm cohort (median 2.2) 3/3 · 563 referring domains, 96th pct 2/2 · 1 organic keywords / 6 visits·mo, 18th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 4 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.4 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-18JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness0/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedfee model not published · the rate, retainer or flat fee itself is not published0 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Buffalo × Family Law (24 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
4.2· 87th percentile
563 ref. domains · cohort median 2.2 · Ahrefs rank 32.3M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-18Trust pages
2 / 2
attorney bios · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 65
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-18Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted
Attorneys 1 attorney · every licence checked against the New York attorney register
FI
Frank S. IeraciAdmitted in NY
Client reviews
4.2
★★★★★
Based on 14 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Amherst
Amherst2140 Eggert Rd, Amherst, NY 14226, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law charge?
Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee.
Does Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law offer a free consultation?
Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law does not publish a free consultation on the pages we read. That is not the same as charging for one, and it is worth asking.
Where does Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law have offices?
Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law publishes one office, in Amherst. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law?
Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law names one attorney on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. 1 of 1 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law?
Frank S. Ieraci, Attorney at Law scores 40 and sits at Verified. Passed: licensure, discipline, website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.