- Home
- Philadelphia, PA
- Personal Injury
- Freundlich & Littman, LLC
Freundlich & Littman, LLC
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPhiladelphia, PA● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
7Practice areas
About Freundlich & Littman
Freundlich & Littman works from Walnut Street and names eight attorneys.
128 reviews at 5.0. Contingency fees and a free consultation, published. It publishes eight case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2173 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on the discipline of members of the Pennsylvania bar, prosecuted by its Disciplinary Board, 1976 to 2019. 2 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
5 average over 128 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
63out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Pennsylvania does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).
LFL Verified 20262 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (82% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by PAPennsylvania does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2173 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on the discipline of members of the Pennsylvania bar, prosecuted by its Disciplinary Board, 1976 to 2019. 2 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by PA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Pennsylvania publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 8 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint128 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2012-06-12, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourcePennsylvania publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourcePennsylvania publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes10/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted8 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted6 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved128 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 128 reviews → Bayesian 4.92 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle4 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-05-11) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority9/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pass · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm4 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 12 → 37th pct of 73-firm cohort (median 19) 1/3 · 999 referring domains, 42th pct 1/2 · 110 organic keywords / 473 visits·mo, 50th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness3/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Philadelphia Personal Injury (74 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
12· 37th percentile
999 ref. domains · cohort median 19 · Ahrefs rank 15.4M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Passmobile
Performance 96
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26Practice areas 7 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Freundlich & Littman, LLC lists 8 case results on its own website, across 6 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplace
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 7 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Pennsylvania attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
AF
Austin Ross FreundlichFounding Partner
GL
Gregory Creed LittmanFounding Partner
SL
Samantha LeedsTrial Attorney
NP
Nathaniel PeckhamTrial Attorney
AS
A. Dalton SpitznogleTrial Attorney
VK
Virginia KingOf Counsel
SH
Sarah HolmesOf Counsel
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 128 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Philadelphia
Philadelphia1425 Walnut St #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Freundlich & Littman charge?
Freundlich & Littman publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Freundlich & Littman offer a free consultation?
Yes. Freundlich & Littman publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Freundlich & Littman have offices?
Freundlich & Littman publishes one office, in Philadelphia. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Freundlich & Littman?
Freundlich & Littman names eight attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Pennsylvania does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Freundlich & Littman publishes verified?
No. Freundlich & Littman publishes eight case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Freundlich & Littman?
Freundlich & Littman scores 61 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.