1. Home
  2. Miami, FL
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada

Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryMiami, FL● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.7 · 240 Google reviews4 offices12 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas

About Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada

Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada works from four offices across Florida, among them Miami, Homestead and Naples, and names twelve attorneys.

240 reviews at 4.7 across four listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes 25 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 1237 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Florida on the discipline of Florida Bar members, 1946 to 2026. 2 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

4.7 average over 240 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

25 results published

Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

57out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Florida does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G1) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).

LFL Verified 2026
8 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (68% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by FLFlorida does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 1237 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Florida on the discipline of Florida Bar members, 1946 to 2026. 2 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeFRIEDMAN, RODMAN & FRANK, P.A. is an active DOMP on the Florida register, document M55205, filed 1987-07-08, with 4 Google-verified locations
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 12 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint240 public client reviews and 39 years since the entity was filed in 1987
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceFlorida publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceFlorida publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of Association of Trial Lawyers of America, American Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted25 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
14/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved240 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 4 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.7 over 240 reviews → Bayesian 4.74 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle6 of 12 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-04-30) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle2 of 12 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them2 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 10 → 42th pct of 72-firm cohort (median 19) 1/3 · 700 referring domains, 3th pct 0/2 · 277 organic keywords / 2,385 visits·mo, 74th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle4 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Miami Personal Injury (100 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
10· 30th percentile
700 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 17.2M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · blog · disclaimer · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 51
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-23

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada lists 25 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplaceproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 12 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.7
★★★★★
Based on 240 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 4 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 4 locations · main office: Miami

Miami3636 W Flagler St, Miami, FL 33135, USA
Homestead30385 S Dixie Hwy, Homestead, FL 33033, USA
Naples2590 Golden Gate Pkwy Ste 112, Naples, FL 34105, USA
Miami Beach605 Lincoln Rd Ste 301, Miami Beach, FL 33139, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada charge?
Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada offer a free consultation?
Yes. Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada have offices?
Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada publishes four offices, in Miami, Homestead, Naples and Miami Beach. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada?
Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada names twelve attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Florida does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada publishes verified?
No. Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada publishes 25 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada?
Friedman Rodman Frank & Estrada scores 56 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, entity registration, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.