- Home
- Phoenix, AZ
- Personal Injury
- Gallagher & Kennedy
Gallagher & Kennedy
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPhoenix, AZ● Accepting new clients
Contingency
Under our contingency fee payment system, you will never have to pay out of pocket for our legal services.
FreeInitial consultation
8Practice areas
About Gallagher & Kennedy
Gallagher & Kennedy works from East Camelback Road and names nine attorneys.
150 reviews at 4.9. Contingency fees and a free consultation, published. It publishes 56 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
4.9 average over 150 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
Under our contingency fee payment system, you will never have to pay out of pocket for our legal services.
56 results published
Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
64out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Arizona does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).
LFL Verified 20261 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (79% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · E4 Availability: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by AZArizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by AZArizona does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by AZ1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Arizona publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 8 named attorneys published, and 1 more person in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 Footprint150 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2019-10-23, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Bar Association, American Association for Justice, American College of Trial Lawyers · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted56 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved150 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 150 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-20) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 27 → 70th pct of 100-firm cohort (median 16) 2/3 · 1,246 referring domains, 71th pct 1/2 · 318 organic keywords / 4,884 visits·mo, 84th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness5/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “Under our contingency fee payment system, you will never have to pay out of pocket for our legal services.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Phoenix Personal Injury (101 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
27· 70th percentile
1,246 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 5.1M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · privacy policy · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 69
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Gallagher & Kennedy lists 56 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 7 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Arizona attorney register · 1 person is named in a role that is not a lawyer’s
KN
Kevin NealShareholder
SC
Shannon L. ClarkShareholder
MB
Matthew R. BoatmanShareholder
KR
Kenneth N. RalstonShareholder
TN
Timothy S. NewmanAssociate
SF
Shayna R. FriedenAssociate
RB
Robert W. BoatmanShareholder
Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s
The firm names this person among its team and prints the role below beside the name. They are not counted as attorneys.
- Angel J. Medina Client Intake Specialist
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 150 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Phoenix
Phoenix2575 E Camelback Rd #1100, Phoenix, AZ 85016, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Gallagher & Kennedy charge?
Gallagher & Kennedy publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Gallagher & Kennedy offer a free consultation?
Yes. Gallagher & Kennedy publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Gallagher & Kennedy have offices?
Gallagher & Kennedy publishes one office, in Phoenix. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Gallagher & Kennedy?
Gallagher & Kennedy names nine attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Arizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Gallagher & Kennedy publishes verified?
No. Gallagher & Kennedy publishes 56 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Gallagher & Kennedy?
Gallagher & Kennedy scores 62 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.