- Home
- Phoenix, AZ
- Personal Injury
- Game Time Attorneys
Game Time Attorneys
ListedPersonal InjuryPhoenix, AZ● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
Hospital& home visits
5Practice areas
About Game Time Attorneys
Game Time Attorneys works from North Michigan Avenue in Chicago, with a second office in Phoenix, and names no attorney on the pages we could reach.
38 reviews at 5.0 across two listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line, hospital and home visits and pages in Spanish, published.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
41out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Arizona does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
24 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (40% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +8 available
G1 LicensureNot published by AZArizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by AZArizona does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by AZ2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Arizona publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint38 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2023-09-20, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience15/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved38 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 38 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle4 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-02-25) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority4/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 0.2 → 2th pct of 100-firm cohort (median 16) 0/3 · 778 referring domains, 10th pct 0/2 · 0 organic keywords / 0 visits·mo, 2th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)0 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 7 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.7 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness10/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line · Hospital & home visits5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Phoenix Personal Injury (101 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
0.2· 2th percentile
778 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 81.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
3 / 3
blog · privacy policy · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 88
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 5 areas · primary focus highlighted
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 38 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 2 locations · main office: Chicago
Chicago205 N Michigan Ave Suit 810, Chicago, IL 60601, USA
Phoenix4435 E Chandler Blvd Ste 200, Phoenix, AZ 85048, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Game Time Attorneys charge?
Game Time Attorneys publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Game Time Attorneys offer a free consultation?
Yes. Game Time Attorneys publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock, the firm states it will visit clients in hospital or at home and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Game Time Attorneys have offices?
Game Time Attorneys publishes two offices, in Chicago and Phoenix. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Game Time Attorneys?
Game Time Attorneys names no attorney on the public pages we could read. That is a gap in what the firm publishes rather than a statement about who works there, and it is why the licensure and discipline checks on this profile have nothing to run against.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Game Time Attorneys?
Game Time Attorneys scores 40 and sits at Listed. Passed: footprint. Did not pass: website. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.