GLK Law
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 67Personal InjuryNew York, NY● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
8Practice areas
About GLK Law
GLK Law works from Broadway in Manhattan, with a second office in Englewood, and names five attorneys.
106 reviews at 4.9. A free consultation and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes seven case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 67 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
No public discipline
None of the 4 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
4.9 average over 106 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
36 years average at the bar
Mean 36.2 years since admission across 4 of 5 named attorneys (longest 52, shortest 8) · NYS Attorney Registration database
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
67out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that New York does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar E (2/15).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 202611 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (82% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +5 available · E4 Availability: +5 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +4.5 available
G1 Licensure4 of 5 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status. 1 could not be told apart from namesakes in the register and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNone of the 4 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
G3 Entity & officeNo answer in the recordNo matching entity found in the active corporations register. New York does not require a general partnership to file with the Department of State, so this is not evidence against the firm, only a check we could not complete from this source
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 5 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint106 public client reviews and 30 years since its web address was registered in 1997
AProfessional Standing18/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 36.2 years since admission across 4 of 5 named attorneys (longest 52, shortest 8) · NYS Attorney Registration database10 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry4 of 5 named attorneys matched to the New York register; no bar number published on any bio4.5 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of New York State Trial Lawyers Association, American Association for Justice, Association of Trial Lawyers of America and 3 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted7 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted10 case types named; 3 court or county references5 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved106 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 106 reviews → Bayesian 4.86 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-05-22) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority9/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 31 → 60th pct of 79-firm cohort (median 27.5) 2/3 · 1,167 referring domains, 82th pct 2/2 · 260 organic keywords / 849 visits·mo, 49th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness2/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: New York × Personal Injury (81 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
31· 59th percentile
1,167 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 3.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · disclaimer · privacy policy · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 93
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-10Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
GLK Law lists 7 case results on its own website, across 10 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplacepedestrianproduct liabilitymunicipal
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 4 attorneys · every licence checked against the New York attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
MF
Michael A. FruhlingAdmitted in NY
AM
Anthony MakarovAdmitted in NY
EM
Edward P. MilsteinAdmitted in NY
JD
Jay W. DanknerAdmitted in NY
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 106 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 2 locations · main office: Gersowitz Libo & Korek, P.C.
Gersowitz Libo & Korek, P.C.140 Broadway Suite 4540, New York, NY 10005, USA
Gersowitz Libo & Korek, P.C.157 Engle St, Englewood, NJ 07631, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does GLK Law charge?
GLK Law publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does GLK Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. GLK Law publishes a free initial consultation. It publishes material in Spanish.
Where does GLK Law have offices?
GLK Law publishes two offices, in Manhattan and Englewood. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at GLK Law?
GLK Law names five attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. 4 of 5 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status. 1 could not be told apart from namesakes in the register and are counted neither way.
Are the case results GLK Law publishes verified?
No. GLK Law publishes seven case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about GLK Law?
GLK Law scores 64 and sits at Verified. Passed: licensure, discipline, website and footprint. Did not pass: entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.