ListedPersonal InjuryNew York, NY● Accepting new clients
★★★★★4.9 · 121 Google reviews2 offices5 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About GLK Law
GLK Law is a personal injury firm with two offices across New York and New Jersey.
The firm states that the first consultation is free. It publishes material in English and Spanish. It does not state a fee model on its public pages, so none is recorded here.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
No public discipline
None of the 4 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
4.91 average over 121 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
36 years average at the bar
Mean 36.2 years since admission across 4 of 5 named attorneys (longest 52, shortest 8) · NYS Attorney Registration database
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
56out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 97 of the 100 points this firm's state lets anyone measure. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar E (2/15).
14 points to Certified
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (80% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: D2 Search authority: +6 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +5.0 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +5 available
G1 Licensure4 of 5 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status. 1 could not be told apart from namesakes in the register and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNone of the 4 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
G3 Entity & officeNot checkedNo matching entity found in the active corporations register. New York does not require a general partnership to file with the Department of State, so this is not evidence against the firm, only a check we could not complete from this source
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 5 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint121 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 1997-01-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing
16/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 36.2 years since admission across 4 of 5 named attorneys (longest 52, shortest 8) · NYS Attorney Registration database9 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry4 of 5 named attorneys matched to the New York register; no bar number published on any bio4.5 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of New York State Trial Lawyers Association, American Association for Justice, Association of Trial Lawyers of America and 3 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted7 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted10 case types named; 3 court or county references5 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present, as the advertising rules require4 / 4
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved121 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.91 over 121 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle8 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-05-27) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
GLK Law lists 7 case results on its own website, across 10 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 4 attorneys · every licence checked against the New York attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
MF
Michael A. FruhlingAdmitted in NY
AM
Anthony MakarovAdmitted in NY
EM
Edward P. MilsteinAdmitted in NY
JD
Jay W. DanknerAdmitted in NY
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Andrew L. Libo
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 121 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm