- Home
- New York, NY
- Personal Injury
- Godosky & Gentile
Godosky & Gentile
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryNew York, NY● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
1Practice areas
About Godosky & Gentile
Godosky & Gentile works from State Street in Manhattan and names four attorneys.
25 reviews at 4.9. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
None of the 4 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
21 years average at the bar
Mean 20.5 years since admission across 4 of 4 named attorneys (longest 33, shortest 10) · NYS Attorney Registration database
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
68out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 72 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that New York does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar B in particular. Strongest pillar: A; most headroom in pillar B (0/15).
LFL Verified 2026Certified needs more measured
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (88% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B1 Results published: not yet measured (6 pts) · B2 Specificity: not yet measured (5 pts) · B3 Results disclosure: not yet measured (4 pts)
G1 Licensure4 of 4 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status
G2 DisciplineNone of the 4 named attorneys carries a disciplinary status on the public register: no disbarment, suspension or disciplinary resignation. Those statuses persist, so the check reaches back years, but it would not show a censure or a suspension since lifted.
G3 Entity & officeGODOSKY & GENTILE, P.C. is an active domestic professional service corporation registered since 1995-04-26, with 1 Google-verified location
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 4 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint25 public client reviews and 31 years since the entity was formed in 1995
AProfessional Standing21/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 20.5 years since admission across 4 of 4 named attorneys (longest 33, shortest 10) · NYS Attorney Registration database9 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry4 of 4 named attorneys matched to the New York register; bar numbers published on the bios9 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of New York State Trial Lawyers Association, New York State Bar Association, New York City Bar Association and 3 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedPendingresults page returned 4030 / 6
B2 SpecificityPendingresults page returned 4030 / 5
B3 Results disclosurePendingresults page returned 4030 / 4
CClient Experience16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved25 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 25 reviews → Bayesian 4.84 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle4 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-04-02) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority5/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 27 → 47th pct of 79-firm cohort (median 27.5) 1/3 · 624 referring domains, 24th pct 0/2 · 74 organic keywords / 265 visits·mo, 36th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 7 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.7 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: New York × Personal Injury (81 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
27· 47th percentile
624 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 5.3M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
2 / 2
blog · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 88
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-10Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted
Attorneys 4 attorneys · every licence checked against the New York attorney register
DG
David M. GodoskyAdmitted in NY
WG
William A. GentileAdmitted in NY
EK
Emily KernAdmitted in NY
JK
James KingAdmitted in NY
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 25 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Manhattan
Manhattan17 State St #800, New York, NY 10004, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Godosky & Gentile charge?
Godosky & Gentile publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Godosky & Gentile offer a free consultation?
Yes. Godosky & Gentile publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Godosky & Gentile have offices?
Godosky & Gentile publishes one office, in Manhattan. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Godosky & Gentile?
Godosky & Gentile names four attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. 4 of 4 named attorneys are currently registered and none carries an adverse status.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Godosky & Gentile?
Godosky & Gentile scores 68 and sits at Verified. Passed: licensure, discipline, entity registration, website and footprint. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.