1. Home
  2. Portland, OR
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Goldberg & Loren

Goldberg & Loren

ListedPersonal InjuryPortland, OR● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.5 · 597 Google reviews3 offices0 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
1Practice areas

About Goldberg & Loren

Goldberg & Loren publishes a Portland address in its own structured data and holds verified listings in Portland, New York and Plantation, Florida. 597 reviews at 4.55.

Contingency fees, a free case review and a 24 hour line, published. It names no attorney on the pages we could reach, which is what G5 asks about, and publishes no case results we could read.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

597 client reviews

Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

41 results published

Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

59out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 100 points this firm's state lets anyone measure. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Listed

1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (79% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: not yet measured (9 pts) · D1 Website trust & experience: +5.0 available
G1 LicensureNot published by OROregon does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by OROregon does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by OR3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. We read the Active Businesses register (data.oregon.gov tckn-sxa6), published as open data by the Oregon Secretary of State and could not identify this firm in it: no entity whose name contains the firm's name. A miss there is not evidence that the firm is unregistered, so this gate is unresolved rather than failed.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint597 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2015-10-15, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityPendingNo attorney is named on the site we could read0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
13/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted41 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present, as the advertising rules require4 / 4
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved597 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.55 over 597 reviews → Bayesian 4.59 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only3 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle10 of 11 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-19) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 11 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
9/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 32 → 82th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 24) 2/3 · 996 referring domains, 84th pct 2/2 · 317 organic keywords / 1,883 visits·mo, 74th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Portland x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
32· 82th percentile
996 ref. domains · cohort median 24 · Ahrefs rank 3.2M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
3 / 3
privacy policy · disclaimer · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 67
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15

Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Goldberg & Loren lists 41 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplacepedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Client reviews

4.5
★★★★★
Based on 597 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 3 locations · main office: Portland

Portland6500 S Macadam Ave Ste 380, Portland, OR 97239, USA
Manhattan5 Columbus Cir Ste 1501, New York, NY 10019, USA
Plantation10189 Cleary Blvd Ste 101, Plantation, FL 33324, USA