- Home
- Portland, OR
- Personal Injury
- Goldberg & Loren
Goldberg & Loren
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 65Personal InjuryPortland, OR● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas
About Goldberg & Loren
Goldberg & Loren publishes a Portland address in its own structured data and holds verified listings in Portland, New York and Plantation, Florida. 597 reviews at 4.55.
Contingency fees, a free case review and a 24 hour line, published. It names no attorney on the pages we could reach, which is what G5 asks about, and publishes no case results we could read.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 65 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 457 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Oregon on the conduct of Oregon State Bar members, 1951 to 2017. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
650 client reviews
Counted across 4 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
41 results published
Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
65out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Oregon does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 202613 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (74% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · A5 Accountability: +3 available
G1 LicensureNot published by OROregon does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 457 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Oregon on the conduct of Oregon State Bar members, 1951 to 2017. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by OR3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. We read the Active Businesses register (data.oregon.gov tckn-sxa6), published as open data by the Oregon Secretary of State and could not identify this firm in it: no entity whose name contains the firm's name. A miss there is not evidence that the firm is unregistered, so this gate is unresolved rather than failed.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 13 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint597 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2015-10-15, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceOregon publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceOregon publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes13/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted41 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience15/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved650 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 4 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.58 over 650 reviews → Bayesian 4.61 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle7 of 16 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-19) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review4 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle3 of 16 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them2 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority9/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 32 → 82th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 24) 2/3 · 996 referring domains, 84th pct 2/2 · 317 organic keywords / 1,883 visits·mo, 74th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle4 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Portland x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
32· 82th percentile
996 ref. domains · cohort median 24 · Ahrefs rank 3.2M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
3 / 3
privacy policy · disclaimer · blog
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 67
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Goldberg & Loren lists 41 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplacepedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 6 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Oregon attorney register · 7 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
GG
George Z. GoldbergFounder & Senior Partner
KG
Katherine M. GoodmanPersonal Injury Attorney
JG
Jonathan GoldbergPersonal Injury Attorney
SP
Samuel PopePersonal Injury Attorney
ZS
Zac StoltzEmployment & Personal Injury Attorney
MK
Matthew KotzenPersonal Injury Attorney
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.6
★★★★★
Based on 650 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 4 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 3 locations · main office: Portland
Portland6500 S Macadam Ave Ste 380, Portland, OR 97239, USA
Manhattan5 Columbus Cir Ste 1501, New York, NY 10019, USA
Plantation10189 Cleary Blvd Ste 101, Plantation, FL 33324, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Goldberg & Loren charge?
Goldberg & Loren publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Goldberg & Loren offer a free consultation?
Yes. Goldberg & Loren publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Goldberg & Loren have offices?
Goldberg & Loren publishes three offices, in Portland, Manhattan and Plantation. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Goldberg & Loren?
Goldberg & Loren names 13 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Oregon does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Goldberg & Loren publishes verified?
No. Goldberg & Loren publishes 41 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Goldberg & Loren?
Goldberg & Loren scores 63 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.