1. Home
  2. Las Vegas, NV
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Hale Injury Law

Hale Injury Law

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLas Vegas, NV● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 742 Google reviews1 office38 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
4Practice areas

About Hale Injury Law

Hale Injury Law works from West Horizon Ridge Parkway in Henderson and names 38 attorneys.

742 reviews at 4.9. A free consultation and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

Leila Hale is named as the respondent in In Re: Discipline Of Leila Hale (2019), and the court did not decide against them: the decision is the court's “Order Rejecting Recommendation and Remanding”. A disciplinary matter is titled this way from the first filing to the last order in it.

742 client reviews

Counted across 1 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.9 average over 742 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

41out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Nevada does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
24 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (50% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by NVNevada does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineLeila Hale is named as the respondent in In Re: Discipline Of Leila Hale (2019), and the court did not decide against them: the decision is the court's “Order Rejecting Recommendation and Remanding”. A disciplinary matter is titled this way from the first filing to the last order in it.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by NV1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Nevada publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 10 named attorneys published, and 28 more people in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 Footprint742 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2013-03-17, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceNevada publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceNevada publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved742 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 742 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-03) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · no fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm0.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 24 → 58th pct of 83-firm cohort (median 19) 2/3 · 1,143 referring domains, 58th pct 1/2 · 81 organic keywords / 411 visits·mo, 61th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
2/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Las Vegas Personal Injury (84 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
24· 58th percentile
1,143 ref. domains · cohort median 19 · Ahrefs rank 6.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
2 / 2
attorney bios · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 43
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-26

Practice areas 4 areas · primary focus highlighted

Personal InjuryCar AccidentsSlip and FallMotorcycle Accidents

Attorneys 6 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Nevada attorney register · 4 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys · 28 people are named in a role that is not a lawyer’s

LH
Leila HaleManaging Attorney
ZO
Zachary OrtaleAttorney
NG
Nick GiorgioneAttorney
BV
Brandon VerdeLitigation Attorney
AS
Austin SorrelsLitigation Attorney
JO
Juana Lucia Vargas OrtizAttorney

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s

The firm names these people among its team and prints the role below beside the names. They are not counted as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 742 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Henderson

Henderson1661 W Horizon Ridge Pkwy Ste 200, Henderson, NV 89012, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Hale Injury Law charge?
Hale Injury Law publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Hale Injury Law offer a free consultation?
Yes. Hale Injury Law publishes a free initial consultation. It publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Hale Injury Law have offices?
Hale Injury Law publishes one office, in Henderson. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Hale Injury Law?
Hale Injury Law names 38 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Nevada does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Hale Injury Law?
Hale Injury Law scores 40 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.