- Home
- San Diego, CA
- Personal Injury
- Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC
HP
Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC
LFL Certified 2026 · Score 66Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
Contingency
We handle personal injury claims on a contingency basis.
FreeInitial consultation
Hospital& home visits
4Practice areas
About Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC
Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC works from West Market Street and names seven attorneys.
118 reviews at 5.0. Contingency fees, a free consultation and hospital and home visits, published. It publishes 78 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Certified 2026
Scored 66 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.
No public discipline
No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 5 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
5 average over 118 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Fee terms published
We handle personal injury claims on a contingency basis.
78 results published
Across 9 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
66out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
LFL Certified
4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar D (7/25).
LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 202612 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (75% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B3 Results disclosure: +4 available · D2 Search authority: +4 available · E3 Languages & accessibility: +4.0 available
G1 Licensure5 of 6 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 1 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 5 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 5 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint118 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2016-07-11, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing16/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 11.4 years since admission across 5 of 5 named attorneys (longest 30, shortest 0) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry5 of 5 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio6 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Board of Trial Advocates, American College of Trial Lawyers · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted78 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted9 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved118 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 5.0 over 118 reviews → Bayesian 4.92 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-29) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 26 → 67th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 2/3 · 1,272 referring domains, 69th pct 1/2 · 146 organic keywords / 559 visits·mo, 64th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30no JSON-LD detected 0/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)0 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness8/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “We handle personal injury claims on a contingency basis.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedHospital & home visits2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
26· 65th percentile
1,272 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 5.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
4 / 4
privacy policy · disclaimer · blog · attorney bios
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 48
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 4 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC lists 78 case results on its own website, across 9 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplacepedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 5 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register
RH
Robert HamparyanAdmitted in NY
CG
Corey GarrardAdmitted in NY
EM
Elizabeth MahsoulAdmitted in NY
JR
Jamie RitterbeckAdmitted in NY
MH
Matthew HamparyanAdmitted in NY
Client reviews
5.0
★★★★★
Based on 118 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: San Diego
San Diego275 W Market St Unit 1000, San Diego, CA 92101, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC charge?
Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC offer a free consultation?
Yes. Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC publishes a free initial consultation. The firm states it will visit clients in hospital or at home.
Where does Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC have offices?
Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC publishes one office, in San Diego. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC?
Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC names seven attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC publishes verified?
No. Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC publishes 78 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC?
Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers San Diego, APC scores 64 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.