1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Harting Simkins & Ryan, LLP

Harting Simkins & Ryan, LLP

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 24 Google reviews1 office2 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
Hospital& home visits
8Practice areas

About Harting Simkins & Ryan

Harting Simkins & Ryan, LLP is a personal injury firm with a single office in Long Beach.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free; it will visit clients in hospital or at home. It publishes material in English and Spanish.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 2 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

11 results published

Across 7 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

33 years average at the bar

Mean 33.0 years since admission across 2 of 2 named attorneys (longest 36, shortest 30) · NYS Attorney Registration database

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

61out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: A; most headroom in pillar D (7/25).

LFL Verified 2026
4 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (68% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: B3 Results disclosure: +4 available · C1 Authentic volume: +4 available · D2 Search authority: +4 available
G1 Licensure2 of 2 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 2 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 2 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint24 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2006-06-23, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
19/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 33.0 years since admission across 2 of 2 named attorneys (longest 36, shortest 30) · NYS Attorney Registration database10 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry2 of 2 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio6 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
8/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted11 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
12/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved24 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count1 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 24 reviews → Bayesian 4.84 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle1 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-24) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 20.0 → 62th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 2/3 · 1,327 referring domains, 67th pct 1/2 · 165 organic keywords / 970 visits·mo, 74th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 7 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.7 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedHospital & home visits2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
20· 61th percentile
1,327 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 8.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
3 / 3
disclaimer · attorney bios · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 68
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Harting Simkins & Ryan, LLP lists 11 case results on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 2 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register

GS
Gary S. SimkinsAttorneys
RH
Richard A. HartingAttorneys

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 24 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Long Beach

Long Beach3711 Long Beach Blvd #600, Long Beach, CA 90807, USA