1. Home
  2. New York, NY
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek

Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek

LFL Certified 2026 · Score 72Personal InjuryNew York, NY● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.8 · 130 Google reviews1 office8 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas

About Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek

Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek works from West 44th Street in Manhattan and names eight attorneys.

130 reviews at 4.8. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes 18 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Certified 2026

Scored 72 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.

4.8 average over 130 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

18 results published

Across 9 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

20 years average at the bar

Mean 19.6 years since admission across 7 of 8 named attorneys (longest 31, shortest 5) · NYS Attorney Registration database

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

72out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that New York does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

LFL Certified

3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar D (8/25).

LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 2026
6 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (84% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: D2 Search authority: +4 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +3.0 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +3 available
G1 LicensureNo answer in the record7 of 8 named attorneys are currently registered and none of those carries an adverse status. 1 other name(s) match a register entry that does: David Silverman shares a name with one of 8 registrations, one of them suspended, due to reregister. That entry cannot be tied to this firm's attorney and cannot be ruled out either, so the gate is held open rather than decided.
G2 DisciplineNo answer in the recordNone of the 7 attorneys we identified carries a disciplinary status. 1 name(s) we could not identify share a name with a registration that does, David Silverman among 8 namesakes. Held open.
G3 Entity & officeHECHT, KLEEGER & DAMASHEK, P.C. is an active domestic professional service corporation registered since 2007-12-21, with 1 Google-verified location
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 8 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint130 public client reviews and 19 years since the entity was formed in 2007
Professional Standing
20/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 19.6 years since admission across 7 of 8 named attorneys (longest 31, shortest 5) · NYS Attorney Registration database9 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry7 of 8 named attorneys matched to the New York register; bar numbers published on the bios7.5 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of New York State Trial Lawyers Association, New York State Bar Association, New York City Bar Association and 1 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted18 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted9 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
17/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved130 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.8 over 130 reviews → Bayesian 4.81 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-05-19) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 21 → 40th pct of 79-firm cohort (median 27.5) 1/3 · 772 referring domains, 53th pct 1/2 · 821 organic keywords / 4,139 visits·mo, 78th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: New York × Personal Injury (81 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
21· 39th percentile
772 ref. domains · cohort median 28 · Ahrefs rank 8.2M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
3 / 3
privacy policy · blog · disclaimer
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 57
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-10

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek lists 18 case results on its own website, across 9 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianproduct liabilitymunicipal
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 7 attorneys · every licence checked against the New York attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

MR
Michael RudickAdmitted in NY
JH
Jordan HechtAdmitted in NY
JD
Jonathan DamashekAdmitted in NY
JK
Judd KleegerAdmitted in NY
AB
Andrea V. BordenAdmitted in NY
MB
Matthew BialorAdmitted in NY
DB
Daniel BroccoAdmitted in NY

Also named by the firm

The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 130 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Manhattan

Manhattan19 W 44th St #1500, New York, NY 10036, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek charge?
Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek offer a free consultation?
Yes. Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek have offices?
Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek publishes one office, in Manhattan. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek?
Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek names eight attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from.
Are the case results Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek publishes verified?
No. Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek publishes 18 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek?
Hecht, Kleeger & Damashek scores 71 and sits at Certified. Passed: entity registration, website and footprint. Did not pass: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.