1. Home
  2. Dallas, TX
  3. Personal Injury
  4. J. Alexander Law Firm

J. Alexander Law Firm

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryDallas, TX● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 670 Google reviews3 offices6 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
Hospital& home visits
1Practice areas

About J. Alexander Law Firm

The J. Alexander Law Firm works from Dallas, San Antonio and Houston, names six attorneys, and is one of the few firms here that publishes hospital and home visits alongside its 24 hour line.

Contingency fees and a free case review, published. 670 reviews at 4.92. Its own description is of a Texas and Oklahoma practice.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

670 client reviews

Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.92 average over 670 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

53out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (71% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +6.5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by TX3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. We read the Active Franchise Taxpayers (data.texas.gov 9cir-efmm), published as open data by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, which carries the Secretary of State file number, charter date and status and could not identify this firm in it: 14 entity name(s) contain the firm's name and none of them agrees on both the name and the city. A miss there is not evidence that the firm is unregistered, so this gate is unresolved rather than failed. The franchise tax does not reach a sole proprietorship or a general partnership, so this register can confirm an entity and cannot rule one out.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 6 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint670 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2001-11-25, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
8/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted1 result published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts1 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted6 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present, as the advertising rules require4 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved670 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.92 over 670 reviews → Bayesian 4.91 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle7 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-19) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
4/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · no fresh content0.5 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 29 → 42th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 37) 1/3 · 604 referring domains, 16th pct 0/2 · 178 organic keywords / 1,372 visits·mo, 60th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness
10/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line · Hospital & home visits5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Dallas x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
29· 42th percentile
604 ref. domains · cohort median 37 · Ahrefs rank 4.3M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
1 / 1
privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 77
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15

Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

J. Alexander Law Firm lists 1 case result on its own website, across 6 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathworkplacepedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 1 attorney · every licence checked against the Texas attorney register · 5 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

SA
Sameer AssanieAdmitted in TX

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

  • David Trosman
  • Josh Alexander
  • Laura Rivas
  • Matthew Graham
  • Sherri Hodge

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 670 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 3 locations · main office: Dallas

Dallas12801 N Central Expy Ste 1100, Dallas, TX 75251, USA
San Antonio12621 Silicon Dr Ste 112, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
Houston700 Milam St #1300, Houston, TX 77002, USA