1. Home
  2. Boston, MA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Jason Stone Injury Lawyers

Jason Stone Injury Lawyers

LFL Certified 2026 · Score 73Personal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 937 Google reviews5 offices32 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyNO FEE UNLESS WE WIN — GUARANTEED!
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas

About Jason Stone Injury Lawyers

Jason Stone Injury Lawyers holds five verified offices around Greater Boston, the most of any firm in this ranking, and names 32 people. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published.

969 reviews at 4.87. Its site is among the slowest here on Core Web Vitals, which is what pillar D measures, and it publishes no case results we could read.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Certified 2026

Scored 73 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

937 client reviews

Counted across 4 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.87 average over 937 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Fee terms published

NO FEE UNLESS WE WIN — GUARANTEED!

49 results published

Across 7 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

73out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Massachusetts does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

LFL Certified

3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).

LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 2026
5 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (82% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA5 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 32 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint969 public client reviews across 5 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2011-12-07, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
3/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of Massachusetts Bar Association, Boston Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted49 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved937 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 4 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.87 over 937 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle20 of 20 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-01) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 20 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
11/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 47 → 96th pct of 27-firm cohort (median 20) 3/3 · 1,522 referring domains, 100th pct 2/2 · 694 organic keywords / 3,290 visits·mo, 89th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle4 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 6 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
8/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “NO FEE UNLESS WE WIN — GUARANTEED!” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Boston x Personal Injury (28 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
47· 96th percentile
1,522 ref. domains · cohort median 20 · Ahrefs rank 0.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · disclaimer · privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 38
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Jason Stone Injury Lawyers lists 49 case results on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 32 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 937 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 4 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 5 locations · main office: Boston

Boston225 Friend St #301, Boston, MA 02114, USA
Peabody84 Newbury St Ste Number 101, Peabody, MA 01960, USA
Natick1400 Worcester St Ste Number 2, Natick, MA 01760, USA
Norwood520 Boston Providence Hwy #10, Norwood, MA 02062, USA
Fall River99 S Main St Ste 162, Fall River, MA 02721, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Jason Stone Injury Lawyers charge?
Jason Stone Injury Lawyers publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Jason Stone Injury Lawyers offer a free consultation?
Yes. Jason Stone Injury Lawyers publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Jason Stone Injury Lawyers have offices?
Jason Stone Injury Lawyers publishes five offices, in Boston, Peabody, Natick, Norwood and Fall River. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Jason Stone Injury Lawyers?
Jason Stone Injury Lawyers names 32 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Massachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Jason Stone Injury Lawyers publishes verified?
No. Jason Stone Injury Lawyers publishes 49 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Jason Stone Injury Lawyers?
Jason Stone Injury Lawyers scores 71 and sits at Certified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.