1. Home
  2. Boston, MA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Jason Stone Injury Lawyers

Jason Stone Injury Lawyers

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 969 Google reviews5 offices32 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyNO FEE UNLESS WE WIN — GUARANTEED!
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
1Practice areas

About Jason Stone Injury Lawyers

Jason Stone Injury Lawyers holds five verified offices around Greater Boston, the most of any firm in this ranking, and names 32 people. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published.

969 reviews at 4.87. Its site is among the slowest here on Core Web Vitals, which is what pillar D measures, and it publishes no case results we could read.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

969 client reviews

Counted across 5 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.87 average over 969 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Fee terms published

NO FEE UNLESS WE WIN — GUARANTEED!

49 results published

Across 7 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

60out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Massachusetts does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (74% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +5.0 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA5 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 32 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint969 public client reviews across 5 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2011-12-07, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
9/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted49 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page, which the New York advertising rules effectively require0 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved969 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.87 over 969 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle23 of 25 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-01) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 25 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
11/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 47 → 96th pct of 27-firm cohort (median 20) 3/3 · 1,522 referring domains, 100th pct 2/2 · 694 organic keywords / 3,290 visits·mo, 89th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle5 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness
8/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · NO FEE UNLESS WE WIN — GUARANTEED! · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Boston x Personal Injury (28 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
47· 96th percentile
1,522 ref. domains · cohort median 20 · Ahrefs rank 0.9M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · disclaimer · privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 38
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15

Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Jason Stone Injury Lawyers lists 49 case results on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 32 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

  • Danielle Pacillo
  • Jason Stone
  • Sean Joanis
  • Steven Kfoury
  • Iva Valtcheva Crane
  • Ross Greenstein
  • David DiCenso
  • Michelle Newton
  • Ashley Jancaterino
  • Elyse Pollard
  • Erica Newton
  • Eva McGrath
  • Jacob Deklerk
  • Jennifer Acheson
  • Jennifer Robinson
  • Jennifer Vidito
  • Joseph Brunelle
  • Julia De Oliveira
  • Keith Glover
  • Kim Helms
  • Lexie Wisinieski
  • Meghan Ferreira
  • Nicholas Burson
  • Stephanie Taylor
  • Thomas Dennison
  • Tim Benton
  • Tyler Mayo
  • Michael McGinley
  • Alyssa Ronca
  • John Mersereau
  • Earving Segura
  • Deanna Federico

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 969 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 5 locations · main office: Boston

Boston225 Friend St #301, Boston, MA 02114, USA
Peabody84 Newbury St Ste Number 101, Peabody, MA 01960, USA
Natick1400 Worcester St Ste Number 2, Natick, MA 01760, USA
Norwood520 Boston Providence Hwy #10, Norwood, MA 02062, USA
Fall River99 S Main St Ste 162, Fall River, MA 02721, USA