1. Home
  2. Boston, MA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers

Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers

LFL Certified 2026 · Score 71Personal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 961 Google reviews1 office21 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas

About Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers

Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers works from One International Place and names 21 people. It is one of the few firms in this market that publishes a fee statement as well as a contingency promise, and it publishes every trust page pillar D looks for.

960 reviews at 4.9, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Certified 2026

Scored 71 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

961 client reviews

Counted across 1 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.9 average over 961 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

71out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Massachusetts does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

LFL Certified

3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 2026
7 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (76% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +5 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 168 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on the discipline of attorneys, on the recommendation of the Board of Bar Overseers, 1975 to 2025. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 21 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint960 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2001-11-15, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
10/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted1 result published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts1 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; 1 court or county reference5 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved961 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 961 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-07) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
12/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 39 → 93th pct of 27-firm cohort (median 20) 3/3 · 1,082 referring domains, 85th pct 2/2 · 1,616 organic keywords / 13,823 visits·mo, 100th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Boston x Personal Injury (28 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
39· 93th percentile
1,082 ref. domains · cohort median 20 · Ahrefs rank 1.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
5 / 5
attorney bios · fee statement · blog · disclaimer · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 50
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers lists 1 case result on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 21 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 961 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Boston

Boston1 International Pl #1810, Boston, MA 02110, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers charge?
Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers offer a free consultation?
Yes. Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers have offices?
Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers publishes one office, in Boston. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers?
Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers names 21 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Massachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers?
Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers scores 69 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.