1. Home
  2. Atlanta, GA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Kanner & Pintaluga

Kanner & Pintaluga

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryAtlanta, GA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.2 · 6,504 Google reviews12 offices26 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
Hospital& home visits
8Practice areas

About Kanner & Pintaluga

Kanner & Pintaluga works from twelve offices across Georgia, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Missouri, and names 27 attorneys.

6,504 reviews at 4.24 across twelve listings, the largest count of any firm listed in Atlanta. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line, hospital and home visits and pages in Spanish, published. It publishes four case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 662 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Georgia on the discipline of State Bar of Georgia members, 1979 to 2026. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.

6,504 client reviews

Counted across 12 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

62out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Georgia does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
3 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (61% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · C2 Rating quality: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by GAGeorgia does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 662 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Georgia on the discipline of State Bar of Georgia members, 1979 to 2026. 1 of them share a surname with a disciplined attorney and were read against the text of those decisions, which name somebody else. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by GA12 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Georgia publishes no business register we can query for free. The Secretary of State sells the bulk corporations file over FTP, $500 for a single extract or $5,000 a year for weekly ones, and its free entity search answers an automated reader with a 403 on every path including its own robots file, which is a bot challenge we do not work around. A register that is for sale is a published record in the sense that matters here only if somebody buys it. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 26 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint6,504 public client reviews across 12 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2004-02-26, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceGeorgia publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceGeorgia publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
10/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted4 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted4 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
13/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved6,504 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 12 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.24 over 6,504 reviews → Bayesian 4.25 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only2 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle36 of 58 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-08) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle18 of 58 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them1 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 31 → 70th pct of 79-firm cohort (median 24) 2/3 · 1,798 referring domains, 90th pct 2/2 · 2,453 organic keywords / 23,961 visits·mo, 97th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)6 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle12 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
10/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line · Hospital & home visits5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Atlanta Personal Injury (100 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
31· 56th percentile
1,798 ref. domains · cohort median 27.5 · Ahrefs rank 3.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26
Trust pages
3 / 3
blog · attorney bios · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 44
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-23

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Kanner & Pintaluga lists 4 case results on its own website, across 4 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehiclepremisesmedical malpracticewrongful death
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 1 attorney · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Georgia attorney register · 25 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

HD
Hurricane DamageAttorney

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.2
★★★★★
Based on 6,504 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 12 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 12 locations · main office: Atlanta

Atlanta201 Peachtree St NW Suite 200, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
Boca Raton6600 N Military Trl 2nd Floor, Boca Raton, FL 33496, USA
Tampa100 Ashley Dr S Unit 610, Tampa, FL 33602, USA
Fort Myers1625 Hendry St Ste 400, Fort Myers, FL 33901, USA
Orlando1000 Legion Pl Ste 100, Orlando, FL 32801, USA
Chicago10 S Riverside Plaza Ste 8002, Chicago, IL 60606, USA
Coral Gables2020 Ponce de Leon Blvd PH 2, Coral Gables, FL 33134, USA
Miami5201 Waterford District Dr #800, Miami, FL 33126, USA
Hollywood5124 Hollywood Blvd, Hollywood, FL 33021, USA
Bala Cynwyd1 Bala Plaza Suite 625, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004, USA
Clayton222 S Central Ave Ste 804, Clayton, MO 63105, USA
Savannah100 Bull St Suite 200, Savannah, GA 31401, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Kanner & Pintaluga charge?
Kanner & Pintaluga publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Kanner & Pintaluga offer a free consultation?
Yes. Kanner & Pintaluga publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock, the firm states it will visit clients in hospital or at home and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Kanner & Pintaluga have offices?
Kanner & Pintaluga publishes twelve offices, among them Atlanta, Boca Raton, Tampa and Fort Myers. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Kanner & Pintaluga?
Kanner & Pintaluga names 27 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Georgia does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Kanner & Pintaluga publishes verified?
No. Kanner & Pintaluga publishes four case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Kanner & Pintaluga?
Kanner & Pintaluga scores 60 and sits at Verified. Passed: discipline, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.