- Home
- Atlanta, GA
- Personal Injury
- Karell Trial Attorneys
Karell Trial Attorneys
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryAtlanta, GA● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
Hospital& home visits
7Practice areas
About Karell Trial Attorneys
Karell Trial Attorneys works from Lenox Pointe Northeast and names twelve attorneys.
192 reviews at 4.9. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line and hospital and home visits, published.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
4.9 average over 192 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
49out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Georgia does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 202616 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (58% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +7 available
G1 LicensureNot published by GAGeorgia does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by GA1 of the firm's attorneys share a surname with a disciplined attorney, and for Tawana Lewis 2 of 5 decision(s) naming this surname have no searchable text, so they can be neither tied to nor ruled out against this attorney. The decisions that cannot be read are scans without searchable text, so this is a limit of the published record. Nothing here says the firm's attorney is that person.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by GA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Georgia publishes no business register we can query for free. The Secretary of State sells the bulk corporations file over FTP, $500 for a single extract or $5,000 a year for weekly ones, and its free entity search answers an automated reader with a 403 on every path including its own robots file, which is a bot challenge we do not work around. A register that is for sale is a published record in the sense that matters here only if somebody buys it. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 11 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint192 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2021-06-09, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceGeorgia publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceGeorgia publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes4/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted1 result published on the firm's own site, counted from result headings1 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted5 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved192 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count4 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 192 reviews → Bayesian 4.87 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-23) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority4/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-26DR 9 → 16th pct of 79-firm cohort (median 24) 0/3 · 506 referring domains, 1th pct 0/2 · 19 organic keywords / 1,037 visits·mo, 41th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)1 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 5 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.5 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-26JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness8/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line · Hospital & home visits5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Atlanta Personal Injury (100 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
9· 13th percentile
506 ref. domains · cohort median 27.5 · Ahrefs rank 19.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-26Trust pages
2 / 2
blog · attorney bios
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 49
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-25Practice areas 7 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Karell Trial Attorneys lists 1 case result on its own website, across 5 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathpedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 11 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 192 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Atlanta
Atlanta20 Lenox Pointe NE, Atlanta, GA 30324, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Karell Trial Attorneys charge?
Karell Trial Attorneys publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Karell Trial Attorneys offer a free consultation?
Yes. Karell Trial Attorneys publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and the firm states it will visit clients in hospital or at home.
Where does Karell Trial Attorneys have offices?
Karell Trial Attorneys publishes one office, in Atlanta. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Karell Trial Attorneys?
Karell Trial Attorneys names twelve attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Georgia does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Karell Trial Attorneys?
Karell Trial Attorneys scores 48 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.