- Home
- San Diego, CA
- Personal Injury
- Kazerouni Law Group, APC
Kazerouni Law Group, APC
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Kazerouni Law Group, APC
Kazerouni Law Group, APC works from Fischer Avenue in Costa Mesa, with a second office in San Diego, and names 24 attorneys.
476 reviews at 4.45 across two listings. A free consultation, published. It publishes 46 case results with amounts of its own and they are its figures rather than ones we confirmed. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
476 client reviews
Counted across 2 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
55out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar E (1/15).
LFL Verified 202610 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (68% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +6 available · E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +5 available · E4 Availability: +5 available
G1 Licensure19 of 24 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 5 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo answer in the recordNo disciplinary record is held against any of the 19 attorneys we identified. Mark J. Green could not be told apart from 8 namesakes, one of whom is not eligible to practise. Held open.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 24 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint476 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2007-12-02, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing13/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 13.6 years since admission across 19 of 24 named attorneys (longest 22, shortest 4) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry19 of 24 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Bar Association, American Association for Justice, New Jersey State Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes10/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted46 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted2 case types named; 1 court or county reference4 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved476 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.45 over 476 reviews → Bayesian 4.52 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only3 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle7 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-02) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · no fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 29 → 74th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 2/3 · 1,282 referring domains, 71th pct 1/2 · 674 organic keywords / 3,802 visits·mo, 88th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 6 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness1/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
29· 72th percentile
1,282 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 4.2M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
3 / 3
disclaimer · privacy policy · attorney bios
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 55
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Kazerouni Law Group, APC lists 46 case results on its own website, across 2 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
wrongful deathproduct liability
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Attorneys 24 attorneys · 19 of 24 licences checked against the California attorney register
AT
Ahren TillerOf Counsel
BB
Brett BodieOf Counsel
DM
David J. McGlothlinPartner
MA
Mona AminiPartner
CH
Corey Patrick HanrahanOf Counsel
AG
Amy Lynn Bennecoff GinsburgOf Counsel
AH
Aaron HicksOf Counsel
AC
Anthony ChesterOf Counsel
SS
Sarvi SafaiOf Counsel
PP
Pamela PrescottAssociate Attorney
GP
Gustavo PonceAttorney
RM
Ryan L. McBridePartner
GM
Gil MeliliAssociate Attorney
JG
Jonathan GilAssociate Attorney
CC
Crosby S. ConnollyPartner
NA
Nadir AhmedAssociate Attorney
BD
Blaine DixonOf Counsel
JI
Jason IbeyPartner
MK
Mike KazerouniEsq. Partner
AK
Abbas KazerounianPartner
AA
Assal AssassiPartner
AS
Ali Reza SadrarhamiPartner
RS
Ross SchmiererOf Counsel
MG
Mark J. GreenAssociate Attorney
Client reviews
4.5
★★★★★
Based on 476 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 2 locations · main office: Costa Mesa
Costa Mesa245 Fischer Ave Suite D1, Costa Mesa, CA 92626, USA
San Diego2221 Camino del Rio S #101, San Diego, CA 92108, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Kazerouni Law Group, APC charge?
Kazerouni Law Group, APC publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Kazerouni Law Group, APC offer a free consultation?
Yes. Kazerouni Law Group, APC publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Kazerouni Law Group, APC have offices?
Kazerouni Law Group, APC publishes two offices, in Costa Mesa and San Diego. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Kazerouni Law Group, APC?
Kazerouni Law Group, APC names 24 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
Are the case results Kazerouni Law Group, APC publishes verified?
No. Kazerouni Law Group, APC publishes 46 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Kazerouni Law Group, APC?
Kazerouni Law Group, APC scores 54 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.