1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. KJT Law Group

KJT Law Group

LFL Certified 2026 · Score 71Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 308 Google reviews1 office19 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyNo fee unless we win” refers to attorney fees only.
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
7Practice areas

About KJT Law Group

KJT Law Group is a personal injury firm with a single office in Glendale.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free; its intake line is open around the clock. It publishes material in English and Spanish.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Certified 2026

Scored 71 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 8 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

308 client reviews

Counted across 1 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.9 average over 308 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Fee terms published

No fee unless we win” refers to attorney fees only.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

42 results published

Across 8 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

18 years average at the bar

Mean 17.8 years since admission across 8 of 19 named attorneys (longest 40, shortest 5) · NYS Attorney Registration database

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

71out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

LFL Certified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (10/25).

LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 28, 2026
7 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (74% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +8 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +3.5 available · A5 Accountability: +3 available
G1 Licensure8 of 19 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 11 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 8 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 20 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint308 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2014-03-28, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
10/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 17.8 years since admission across 8 of 19 named attorneys (longest 40, shortest 5) · NYS Attorney Registration database9 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry8 of 19 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio1 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
13/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted42 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted8 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved308 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 308 reviews → Bayesian 4.88 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-05) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 35.0 → 87th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 3/3 · 1,563 referring domains, 82th pct 2/2 · 309 organic keywords / 1,829 visits·mo, 82th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
9/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “No fee unless we win” refers to attorney fees only.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
35· 85th percentile
1,563 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 2.5M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
2 / 2
privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 34
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

KJT Law Group lists 42 case results on its own website, across 8 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

constructionmotor vehicletruckworkplacepedestrianproduct liabilitymunicipalassault
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 13 attorneys · 8 of 13 licences checked against the California attorney register · 6 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

CJ
Caspar JivalagianEsq.
VT
Vaché ThomassianFounding Partner
HB
Hagop BaronianAdmitted in CA
AT
Aaron TurchinPersonal Injury & Employment Attorney
DW
David M. WrightSenior Trial Counsel
CA
Christopher AdamsEmployment Litigation Attorney
LY
Levon Shant YepremianEmployment Litigation Attorney
TK
Tro KrikorianAttorney
TS
Tro SemerjianPersonal Injury Litigation Attorney
IE
Inland EmpirePersonal Injury Attorney
OB
Oxnard Bed BugsAttorney
SP
South PasadenaPersonal Injury Attorney
VB
Van Nuys Bed BugsAttorney

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 308 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Glendale

Glendale230 N Maryland Ave #306, Glendale, CA 91206, USA