LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryNorthwest Indiana, IN● Accepting new clients
★★★★★4.6 · 148 Google reviews1 office9 attorneysEnglish
Contingency, hourly or flat fee depending on the matterWe may charge by an hourly rate, a flat fee for specific services, or offer contingency (no-win, no-fee) arrangements for certain cases.
FreeInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Langer & Langer
Langer & Langer has practised from Valparaiso since 1980 across medical malpractice, injury and family law, and nine people are named on its site.
Its fee terms are the most detailed in this market and also the most conditional: the firm says it may charge an hourly rate, a flat fee for specific services, or a contingency arrangement for certain cases, and that a first consultation may be free or may carry a charge. Its marketing says no fees unless we win. Both statements are the firm's own, and the profile records the longer one.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 301 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Indiana on the discipline of Indiana attorneys, 1960 to 2026. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
Fee terms published
We may charge by an hourly rate, a flat fee for specific services, or offer contingency (no-win, no-fee) arrangements for certain cases.
18 results published
Across 7 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
58out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Indiana does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: B; most headroom in pillar A (3/25).
LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (80% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D1 Website trust & experience: +5.0 available
G1 LicensureNot published by INIndiana does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 301 published discipline decisions of the Supreme Court of Indiana on the discipline of Indiana attorneys, 1960 to 2026. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by IN1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. Indiana publishes no business register we can query. INBiz answers an automated reader with a 403 and the Secretary of State's business search answers with a 202 and an empty body, which is a bot challenge, and we do not work around either. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 9 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint148 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2005-07-05, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing
3/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceIndiana publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice, Association of Trial Lawyers of America, American Board of Trial Advocates and 1 more · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted18 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present, as the advertising rules require4 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved148 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.6 over 148 reviews → Bayesian 4.69 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-06-22) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · We may charge by an hourly rate, a flat fee for specific services, or offer contingency (no-win, no-fee) arrangements for certain cases. · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Langer & Langer lists 18 case results on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
motor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpracticewrongful deathpedestrianmunicipal
Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 9 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Michael A. Langer
Kayleen M. Teufel
Robert A. Langer
Steven L. Langer
Sara A. Langer
Jon F. Schmoll
Heather Gilbert
Danielle Polito
Bianca G. Gamez
Client reviews
4.6
★★★★★
Based on 148 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: Valparaiso
Valparaiso4 Indiana Ave, Valparaiso, IN 46383, USA
