- Home
- Boston, MA
- Personal Injury
- Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
ListedPersonal InjuryBoston, MA● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
8Practice areas
About Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
The Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone hold twelve verified listings across Massachusetts, from Springfield to Boston, which is the widest footprint of any firm in this ranking.
Contingency fees, a free case evaluation, a 24 hour line and pages in Spanish, published, along with a fee statement. 1,720 reviews at 4.88. It names no attorney on the pages we could reach, which is what G5 asks for, and the amounts on its results page are its own figures rather than ones we confirmed.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
1,770 client reviews
Counted across 11 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.89 average over 1,770 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
51 results published
Across 7 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
69out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Massachusetts does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Listed
1 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
9 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (84% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +4 available
G1 LicensureNot published by MAMassachusetts does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorneys publishedThis firm names no attorney on the pages we could read, so there is nobody to look up. The register itself exists: Massachusetts publishes its attorney discipline as court decisions and we read them for the other firms in this market.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MA12 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Massachusetts publishes no business register we can query. The Secretary of the Commonwealth's corporate search answers a request for its robots file with a 403 and its search page with a redirect loop, and the state runs no open data portal carrying the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 Footprint1,720 public client reviews across 12 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2002-03-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceMassachusetts publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes13/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted51 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted7 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved1,770 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 11 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.89 over 1,770 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle33 of 55 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-24) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 55 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 23 → 56th pct of 27-firm cohort (median 20) 2/3 · 875 referring domains, 67th pct 1/2 · 185 organic keywords / 883 visits·mo, 58th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle11 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16no JSON-LD detected 0/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)0 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Boston x Personal Injury (28 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
23· 56th percentile
875 ref. domains · cohort median 20 · Ahrefs rank 7.2M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16Trust pages
4 / 4
blog · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 43
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-15Practice areas 8 areas · primary focus highlighted
Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts
What the firm publishes itself
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone lists 51 case results on its own website, across 7 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.
constructionmotor vehicletruckmedical malpracticewrongful deathworkplacepedestrian
See the firm's own results page ↗Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 1,770 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 11 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 12 locations · main office: Springfield
Springfield175 State St #200, Springfield, MA 01103, USA
Boston2 Oliver St #608, Boston, MA 02109, USA
Worcester545 Main St, Worcester, MA 01608, USA
Northampton355 Bridge St, Northampton, MA 01060, USA
Holyoke295 High St, Holyoke, MA 01040, USA
New Haven376 Whalley Ave, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
Boston2379 Washington St, Boston, MA 02119, USA
Norwich1 Perry Ave, Norwich, CT 06360, USA
Chicopee10 Center St #312, Chicopee, MA 01013, USA
Greenfield239 Main St #3, Greenfield, MA 01301, USA
Hartford100 Farmington Ave #2a, Hartford, CT 06105, USA
Ware52 Main St, Ware, MA 01082, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone charge?
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone offer a free consultation?
Yes. Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone have offices?
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone publishes twelve offices, among them Springfield, Boston, Worcester and Northampton. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone?
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone names no attorney on the public pages we could read. That is a gap in what the firm publishes rather than a statement about who works there, and it is why the licensure and discipline checks on this profile have nothing to run against.
Are the case results Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone publishes verified?
No. Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone publishes 51 case results with amounts on its own site. We counted them and we did not confirm them: the figures are the firm's. Pillar B scores whether a firm publishes outcomes and discloses them properly, including whether a prior-results disclaimer appears beside them, not whether the amounts are right. Past results do not predict another case.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone?
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone scores 67 and sits at Listed. Passed: footprint. Did not pass: website. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.