1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Law Offices of Pius Joseph

Law Offices of Pius Joseph

LFL Certified 2026 · Score 66Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 52 Google reviews1 office1 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
6Practice areas

About Law Offices of Pius Joseph

Law Offices of Pius Joseph is a personal injury firm with a single office in Pasadena.

The firm states that the first consultation is free. It publishes material in English and Spanish. It does not state a fee model on its public pages, so none is recorded here.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Certified 2026

Scored 66 out of 100 on measured evidence, above the 70 this tier requires, with every eligibility gate its state allows us to check cleared.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 1 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

39 years average at the bar

Mean 39.0 years since admission across 1 of 1 named attorneys (longest 39, shortest 39) · NYS Attorney Registration database

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

66out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

LFL Certified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar E (2/15).

LFL Certified 2026 · re-verified Oct 24, 2026
12 points to Distinguished
78 needed · A+B+C floor met (79% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: E1 Free consult & fee transparency: +5 available · E4 Availability: +5 available · D2 Search authority: +4 available
G1 Licensure1 of 1 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 1 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 1 named attorney published.
G6 Footprint52 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2001-12-02, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
19/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 39.0 years since admission across 1 of 1 named attorneys (longest 39, shortest 39) · NYS Attorney Registration database10 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry1 of 1 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio6 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedmember of American Association for Justice, American Bar Association · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them3 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
10/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted7 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts3 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted4 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present beside the published results4 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved52 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count2 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 52 reviews → Bayesian 4.85 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-05-23) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pass · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm4 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 27.0 → 72th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 2/3 · 1,040 referring domains, 35th pct 1/2 · 106 organic keywords / 822 visits·mo, 70th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
2/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
27· 71th percentile
1,040 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 5.6M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
4 / 4
attorney bios · blog · disclaimer · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Passmobile
Performance 100
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Law Offices of Pius Joseph lists 7 case results on its own website, across 4 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehicletruckpremisesmedical malpractice
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 1 attorney · every licence checked against the California attorney register

PJ
Pius JosephAdmitted in CA

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 52 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Pasadena

Pasadena595 E Colorado Blvd #801, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA