1. Home
  2. Phoenix, AZ
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Law Tigers

Law Tigers

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPhoenix, AZ● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 5.0 · 2,496 Google reviews12 offices53 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
3Practice areas

About Law Tigers

Law Tigers works from twelve offices across California, Arizona, Alabama, Minnesota, Oklahoma and Oregon, and names 53 attorneys.

2,496 reviews at 4.95 across twelve listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

2,496 client reviews

Counted across 12 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.95 average over 2,496 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

49out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Arizona does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
16 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (50% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by AZArizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by AZArizona does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by AZ12 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Arizona publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 53 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint2,496 public client reviews across 12 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2000-01-13, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved2,496 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 12 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.95 over 2,496 reviews → Bayesian 4.95 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle53 of 60 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-01) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 60 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
9/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · no disclaimer · no fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm0 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 59 → 99th pct of 100-firm cohort (median 16) 3/3 · 2,615 referring domains, 100th pct 2/2 · 875 organic keywords / 3,945 visits·mo, 88th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle12 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 6 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Phoenix Personal Injury (101 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
59· 99th percentile
2,615 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 0.3M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
1 / 1
attorney bios
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 42
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30

Practice areas 3 areas · primary focus highlighted

Personal InjuryWrongful DeathMotorcycle Accidents

Client reviews

5.0
★★★★★
Based on 2,496 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 12 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 12 locations · main office: Los Angeles

Los Angeles11175 Santa Monica Blvd Ste. 400, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA
San Diego9245 Dowdy Dr Ste 218, San Diego, CA 92126, USA
Scottsdale7882 E Gray Rd #3, Scottsdale, AZ 85260, USA
San Francisco230 California St #308, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA
Birmingham2101 Highland Ave Suite 210, Birmingham, AL 35205, USA
Sacramento3436 American River Dr Ste 12, Sacramento, CA 95864, USA
St Paul380 E Lafayette Frontage Rd Ste 217, St Paul, MN 55107, USA
Oklahoma City1332 SW 89th St Ste A, Oklahoma City, OK 73159, USA
Phoenix1860 N 95th Ln Ste 104, Phoenix, AZ 85037, USA
Tempe350 W Washington St Ste 201, Tempe, AZ 85288, USA
Tucson10 N Norton Ave, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
Portland917 SW Oak St #312, Portland, OR 97205, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Law Tigers charge?
Law Tigers publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Law Tigers offer a free consultation?
Yes. Law Tigers publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Law Tigers have offices?
Law Tigers publishes twelve offices, among them Los Angeles, San Diego, Scottsdale and San Francisco. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Law Tigers?
Law Tigers names 53 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Arizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Law Tigers?
Law Tigers scores 48 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.