1. Home
  2. Dallas, TX
  3. Personal Injury
  4. LAWBOSS - Uvalle Law Firm, PLLC

LAWBOSS - Uvalle Law Firm, PLLC

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryDallas, TX● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.8 · 4,955 Google reviews3 offices7 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
1Practice areas

About LAWBOSS - Uvalle Law Firm

LAWBOSS, the Uvalle Law Firm, works from Dallas, Houston and San Antonio and names seven attorneys. Its Google listings carry 4,955 reviews between them, the largest count of any firm in this ranking and one of the largest in the directory.

It publishes a contingency fee, a free case review and a 24 hour line, and no case results we could read. Its own pages describe a practice across Texas rather than a Dallas one.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

4,955 client reviews

Counted across 3 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.75 average over 4,955 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

54out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 78 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillar A in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (78% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · D2 Search authority: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by TX3 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. We read the Active Franchise Taxpayers (data.texas.gov 9cir-efmm), published as open data by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, which carries the Secretary of State file number, charter date and status and could not identify this firm in it: no entity whose name contains the firm's name. A miss there is not evidence that the firm is unregistered, so this gate is unresolved rather than failed. The franchise tax does not reach a sole proprietorship or a general partnership, so this register can confirm an entity and cannot rule one out.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 7 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint4,955 public client reviews across 3 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2011-10-05, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
12/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted15 results published on the firm's own site, counted from result headings4.5 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted4 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up3 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedPrior-results disclaimer present, as the advertising rules require4 / 4
CClient Experience
18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved4,955 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.75 over 4,955 reviews → Bayesian 4.75 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle15 of 15 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-29) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 15 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pending · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content1.5 / 7
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-16DR 19 → 24th pct of 19-firm cohort (median 37) 1/3 · 680 referring domains, 42th pct 1/2 · 25 organic keywords / 380 visits·mo, 11th pct 0/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)2 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle3 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-16content 0/2 · JSON-LD detected 1/1 · earned media 0/11 / 5
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Oct 1, 2026 · Cohort: Dallas x Personal Injury (20 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
19· 24th percentile
680 ref. domains · cohort median 37 · Ahrefs rank 9.4M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-16
Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · blog · privacy policy
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Not measuredmobile
PageSpeed Insights measurement pending
Pending

Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

LAWBOSS - Uvalle Law Firm, PLLC lists 15 case results on its own website, across 4 case types. The page carries its own disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful death
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 7 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

  • Joseph Massey
  • Howard Hill
  • Robert Moss
  • Rolando Reyna Jr
  • Jonathan Harris
  • Ian Nelsen
  • Michael Uvalle

Client reviews

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 4,955 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 3 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 3 locations · main office: Dallas

Dallas5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 240W, Dallas, TX 75244, USA
Houston5300 Memorial Dr Ste 810, Houston, TX 77007, USA
San Antonio8200 I-10 Suite 315, San Antonio, TX 78230, USA