- Home
- San Diego, CA
- Personal Injury
- Lemgarcialaw.com
Lemgarcialaw.com
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Diego, CA● Accepting new clients
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
6Practice areas
About Lemgarcialaw.com
Lemgarcialaw.com works from West Cameron Avenue in West Covina, with a second office in Oceanside, and names three attorneys.
438 reviews at 4.9 across two listings. Contingency fees, a free consultation and a 24 hour line, published.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
438 client reviews
Counted across 2 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.9 average over 438 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
46out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 202619 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (50% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNo answer in the recordNone of the 2 attorneys this firm names could be found in the State Bar of California's register, so there is nothing here to clear or to fault.
G2 DisciplineNo answer in the recordNo attorney this firm names could be identified in the register, so no disciplinary record could be looked up either.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 3 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint438 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2014-04-24, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is no admission year to establish for anybody. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved438 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 438 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle10 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-07-31) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 34 → 83th pct of 109-firm cohort (median 14) 2/3 · 785 referring domains, 15th pct 0/2 · 92 organic keywords / 480 visits·mo, 60th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness6/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Diego Personal Injury (113 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
34· 81th percentile
785 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 2.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · blog · disclaimer
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 70
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30Practice areas 6 areas · primary focus highlighted
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 438 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 2 locations · main office: West Covina
West Covina1720 W Cameron Ave #210, West Covina, CA 91790, USA
Oceanside918 Mission Ave #101, Oceanside, CA 92054, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Lemgarcialaw.com charge?
Lemgarcialaw.com publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Lemgarcialaw.com offer a free consultation?
Yes. Lemgarcialaw.com publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock.
Where does Lemgarcialaw.com have offices?
Lemgarcialaw.com publishes two offices, in West Covina and Oceanside. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Lemgarcialaw.com?
Lemgarcialaw.com names three attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: California does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Lemgarcialaw.com?
Lemgarcialaw.com scores 44 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.