1. Home
  2. Phoenix, AZ
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys

Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryPhoenix, AZ● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.8 · 5,299 Google reviews14 offices78 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyThe reason being is that our injury law firm works on a contingency fee basis.
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
Hospital& home visits
6Practice areas

About Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys

Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys works from 14 offices across Arizona, Nevada, Illinois, New Mexico, Indiana and California, and names 95 attorneys, the largest roster of any firm listed in Phoenix.

5,299 reviews at 4.76 across 14 listings, the largest count of any firm listed in Phoenix. Contingency fees, a free consultation, a 24 hour line, hospital and home visits and pages in Spanish, published.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

5,299 client reviews

Counted across 14 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.76 average over 5,299 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Fee terms published

The reason being is that our injury law firm works on a contingency fee basis.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

58out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Arizona does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

2 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

LFL Verified 2026
7 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (42% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by AZArizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by AZArizona does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by AZ14 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Arizona publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 87 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint5,299 public client reviews across 14 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2006-12-29, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceArizona publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
16/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved5,299 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 14 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.76 over 5,299 reviews → Bayesian 4.76 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle57 of 69 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-28) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle7 of 69 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them2 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
12/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 70 → 100th pct of 100-firm cohort (median 16) 3/3 · 2,606 referring domains, 99th pct 2/2 · 1,040 organic keywords / 12,029 visits·mo, 96th pct 2/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)7 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle14 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
12/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · “The reason being is that our injury law firm works on a contingency fee basis.” · the fee percentage itself is not published5 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line · Hospital & home visits5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Phoenix Personal Injury (101 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
70· 100th percentile
2,606 ref. domains · cohort median 16 · Ahrefs rank 0.1M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30
Trust pages
5 / 5
disclaimer · fee statement · blog · privacy policy · attorney bios
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 86
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-30

Client reviews

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 5,299 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 14 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 14 locations · main office: Phoenix

Phoenix2701 E Camelback Rd Ste 140, Phoenix, AZ 85016, USA
Las Vegas4795 S Durango Dr, Las Vegas, NV 89147, USA
Mesa5022 S Power Rd #104, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA
Chicago114 E Cermak Rd, Chicago, IL 60616, USA
Glendale7200 W Bell Rd D2, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA
Albuquerque2711 Carlisle Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM 87110, USA
Chandler3900 W Ray Rd #4, Chandler, AZ 85226, USA
Tolleson9897 W McDowell Rd D400, Tolleson, AZ 85353, USA
Merrillville421 81st Ave, Merrillville, IN 46410, USA
Tucson660 W Valencia Rd, Tucson, AZ 85706, USA
North Las Vegas3155 W Craig Rd #100, North Las Vegas, NV 89032, USA
Los Angeles12400 Wilshire Blvd Ste 1100, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA
Yuma1651 S 4th Ave B4, Yuma, AZ 85364, USA
Bullhead City1850 AZ-95, Bullhead City, AZ 86442, USA

Frequently asked questions

How much does Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys charge?
Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys publishes a contingency fee, which means the fee is a share of what the case recovers and there is nothing to pay if it recovers nothing. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys offer a free consultation?
Yes. Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys publishes a free initial consultation. The intake line is published as open around the clock, the firm states it will visit clients in hospital or at home and it publishes material in Spanish.
Where does Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys have offices?
Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys publishes 14 offices, among them Phoenix, Las Vegas, Mesa and Chicago. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys?
Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys names 95 attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Arizona does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys?
Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys scores 56 and sits at Verified. Passed: website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure, discipline and entity registration. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.