1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Los Abogados de Accidentes

Los Abogados de Accidentes

ListedPersonal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 729 Google reviews5 offices0 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
PaidInitial consultation
2Practice areas

About Los Abogados de Accidentes

Los Abogados de Accidentes is a personal injury firm with five offices across California, including Los Angeles, Downey and Santa Ana.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won. It publishes material in English and Spanish.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

729 client reviews

Counted across 5 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.93 average over 729 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

39out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Listed

2 eligibility gate(s) still to be checked. 3 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2, G3) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).

26 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (46% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNo answer in the recordThis firm names no attorney on its own site, so there is no licence to look up. The State Bar of California does publish a register we can query; it was not the obstacle.
G2 DisciplineNo answer in the recordWith no attorney named, there is no disciplinary record to look up either.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA5 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteNot checkedSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, no attorney is named on the site we could read. The gate also asks for no misleading claims, which is an editorial read we have not recorded.
G6 FootprintNot checked729 public reviews across 5 Google listings, above the 10 minimum; time in operation still to confirm
Professional Standing
0/25
A2 Experienceno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is no admission year to establish for anybody. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno roster publishedOur crawl found no roster on this firm's site, so there is nothing here to verify against a register. Publishing one, or telling us where it is, is what gate G5 asks for.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved729 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.93 over 729 reviews → Bayesian 4.92 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only6 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle8 of 25 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-31) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 25 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
6/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · no privacy policy · disclaimer · no fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm0.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 28.0 → 74th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 2/3 · 844 referring domains, 8th pct 0/2 · 51 organic keywords / 80 visits·mo, 50th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle5 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
4/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedContingency · the fee percentage itself is not published2 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
28· 73th percentile
844 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 5.1M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
1 / 1
disclaimer
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 27
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Practice areas 2 areas · primary focus highlighted

Personal InjurySlip and Fall

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 729 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 5 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 5 locations · main office: Los Angeles

Los Angeles714 W Olympic Blvd #940, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA
Downey8301 Florence Ave #301, Downey, CA 90240, USA
Santa Ana206 W 4th St #320, Santa Ana, CA 92701, USA
Riverside6956 Indiana Ave #11, Riverside, CA 92506, USA
San Bernardino320 N E St #205, San Bernardino, CA 92401, USA