1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. LyfeLaw

LyfeLaw

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.9 · 635 Google reviews1 office24 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
24/7intake line
6Practice areas

About LyfeLaw

LyfeLaw is a personal injury firm with a single office in Los Angeles.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free; its intake line is open around the clock. It publishes material in English and Spanish.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 19 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

635 client reviews

Counted across 1 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.9 average over 635 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

Service in Spanish

Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

59out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar D (8/25).

LFL Verified 2026
6 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (63% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A6 Roster verifiability: +6 available · B2 Specificity: +4 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 Licensure19 of 25 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 6 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 19 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA1 physical location verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 25 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint635 public client reviews across 1 Google listing, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 1998-05-21, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
10/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 14.4 years since admission across 19 of 24 named attorneys (longest 37, shortest 0) · NYS Attorney Registration database7 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry19 of 24 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio3 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
7/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted67 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted1 case type named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up1 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
19/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved635 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 635 reviews → Bayesian 4.89 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle5 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-04) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · no disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm1.5 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 22.0 → 64th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 2/3 · 2,429 referring domains, 95th pct 2/2 · 28 organic keywords / 408 visits·mo, 56th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)5 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
7/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · Contingency · the fee percentage itself is not published3 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish, Spanish1.5 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
22· 63th percentile
2,429 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 7.8M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
2 / 2
privacy policy · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 28
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

LyfeLaw lists 67 case results on its own website, across 1 case type. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

assault
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 19 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 5 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys

ST
Sam TabibianAdmitted in CA
SM
Sahm ManouchehriAdmitted in CA
SS
Shabnam SaraniAdmitted in CA
SE
Shawn ElliottAdmitted in CA
TM
Troy M. MuellerAdmitted in CA
GW
Greg WongAdmitted in CA
WG
William GravesAdmitted in CA
MF
Mariana FernandezAdmitted in CA
MS
Mateo Rendon SalazarAdmitted in CA
SS
Steven C SaperaAdmitted in CA
DS
Diallo ScottAdmitted in CA
SH
Shawn C. HalbertAdmitted in CA
DC
David Y. ChoiAdmitted in CA
JL
John LitwinAdmitted in CA
CE
Chrystian EscobarAdmitted in CA
NB
Natalie BrionesAdmitted in CA
IM
Isabel MartinezAdmitted in CA
WW
Wendy WellsPhr Cpsp
KY
Kenneth YadidiAdmitted in CA

Also named by the firm

The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 635 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 1 location · main office: Los Angeles

Los Angeles10880 Wilshire Blvd 24th Fl, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA