LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryBaltimore, MD● Accepting new clients
★★★★★4.9 · 2,120 Google reviews8 offices7 attorneysEnglish · Spanish
ContingencyFee model
FreeInitial consultation
2Practice areas
About Malloy Law Offices
Malloy Law Offices, LLC is a personal injury firm with 8 offices across Maryland, Washington DC and Virginia.
The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; the first consultation is free. It publishes service in English and Español.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
No public discipline
No attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2614 published discipline decisions of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, 1976 to 2026. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
2,120 client reviews
Counted across 8 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.
4.88 average over 2,120 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
Service in Spanish
Published by the firm on its own pages, which is how this was measured rather than assumed from a name.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
52out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 63 of the 91 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 9 of them need a register that Maryland does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
All 5 eligibility gates passed. Certification needs more of the scale measured than we have managed here, pillars A and B in particular. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 2026
Certified needs more measured
70 needed · A+B+C floor met (78% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: not yet measured (10 pts) · B1 Results published: not yet measured (6 pts) · B2 Specificity: not yet measured (5 pts)
G1 LicensureNot published by MDMaryland does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNo attorney this firm names appears as the respondent in any of the 2614 published discipline decisions of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, 1976 to 2026. Published decisions record what has been decided, so this covers a disbarment or suspension on the record and not whether a registration is current today.
G3 Entity & officeNot published by MD8 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. Maryland publishes no business register we can query. SDAT's entity search is a form rather than a dataset, its bulk data is sold rather than published, and the state's open data portal carries a count of businesses instead of the register. This is a limit of the published record and not something the firm can change.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 7 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint2,120 public client reviews across 8 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2009-03-31, so it has been operating for more than a year
AProfessional Standing
0/25
A2 ExperiencePendingNot yet assessed0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceMaryland publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
0/15
B1 Results publishedPendingthe results page served no figures and no mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so its results are rendered in the browser rather than served to a reader or a crawler0 / 6
B2 SpecificityPendingthe results page served no figures and no mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so its results are rendered in the browser rather than served to a reader or a crawler0 / 5
B3 Results disclosurePendingthe results page served no figures and no mention of a settlement, verdict or recovery, so its results are rendered in the browser rather than served to a reader or a crawler0 / 4
CClient Experience
18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved2,120 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 8 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.88 over 2,120 reviews → Bayesian 4.88 (prior 4.82 weighted as 100 reviews, from 217 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle38 of 40 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-08-05) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle1 of 40 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them3 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
10/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no bar numbers on bios · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content2 / 7
D3 Local presenceGoogle8 operational Google Business Profile listings with reviews · profile completeness, NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank not yet measured (4 of 5 pts still available)1 / 5
The firm’s people the firm names its people without saying who among them practises law · 7 more people are named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
Also named by the firm
The firm lists these people among its team and prints no role beside the names, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Anaek Johal
Aleksandr Shubin
Daniel Szieber
Laritta Oligie
Seann Patrick Malloy
Stephen Caramenico
Sara Aziz
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 2,120 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 8 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 8 locations · main office: Bethesda
Bethesda7910 Woodmont Ave #1250, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
Baltimore400 E Pratt St #800, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA
Washington316 F St NE #115, Washington, DC 20002, USA
Herndon464 Herndon Pkwy Ste 216, Herndon, VA 20170, USA
Alexandria5350 Shawnee Rd Ste 330, Alexandria, VA 22312, USA
Towson120 Sister Pierre Dr Ste 305, Towson, MD 21204, USA
Ellicott City5024 Dorsey Hall Dr Ste 202-G, Ellicott City, MD 21042, USA
Clinton9135 Piscataway Rd #215, Clinton, MD 20735, USA