- Home
- San Antonio, TX
- Personal Injury
- Martin & Cukjati, LLP
Martin & Cukjati, LLP
LFL Verified 2026Personal InjurySan Antonio, TX● Accepting new clients
Not statedFee model
FreeInitial consultation
1Practice areas
About Martin & Cukjati
Martin & Cukjati works from Blanco Road and names four attorneys.
111 reviews at 4.9. A free consultation, published. It publishes nothing about the rate or the retainer.
What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it
LFL Verified 2026
Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.
4.9 average over 111 reviews
A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.
LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification
32out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 68 of the 68 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 32 of them need a register that Texas does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.
Verified
3 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 2 could not be answered from the available records (G1, G2) and do not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar A (0/25).
LFL Verified 202633 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor not yet met (38% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +10 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +9 available · B1 Results published: +6 available
G1 LicensureNot published by TXTexas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
G2 DisciplineNot published by TXTexas does not publish a disciplinary register we can query.
G3 Entity & officeCURTIS L. CUKJATI, LLC holds an active franchise tax responsibility in Texas with the right to transact business, Secretary of State file 0802864626, chartered 2017-11-21, and 1 Google-verified location. Identified because the name is close and the address is one we verified
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 4 named attorneys published.
G6 Footprint111 public client reviews and 9 years since the entity was chartered in 2017
AProfessional Standing0/25
A2 Experienceno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so years since admission cannot be established here for any firm and this is not scored.0 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityno queryable sourceTexas publishes no attorney register we can query, so the roster is not verified here and this is not scored.0 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes0/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submittedThe firm publishes no case results we could read0 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted0 case types named; no court or county named, so no result can be looked up0 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience14/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved111 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count3 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.9 over 111 reviews → Bayesian 4.86 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only5 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle1 of 5 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-01-28) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review2.5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 5 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority7/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV pass · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · no fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm3 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-09-30DR 3 → 25th pct of 63-firm cohort (median 17.5) 1/3 · 948 referring domains, 35th pct 1/2 · 6 organic keywords / 347 visits·mo, 38th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)3 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle1 operational Google Business Profile listing · 6 photos · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned0.6 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-09-30no JSON-LD detected 0/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)0 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness1/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedFree consultation · fee model not published · the fee percentage itself is not published1 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObservedno availability published0 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: San Antonio Personal Injury (64 firms measured)How the score works →
Digital presence snapshot
Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.
Domain authority
3· 25th percentile
948 ref. domains · cohort median 17.5 · Ahrefs rank 39.0M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-09-30Trust pages
3 / 3
attorney bios · disclaimer · privacy policy
ObservedCore Web Vitals
Passmobile
Performance 100
Observed · PSI, 2026-09-29Practice areas 1 areas · primary focus highlighted
Attorneys 3 attorneys · listed by the firm, licensure not yet checked against the Texas attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys
CC
Curtis L. CukjatiPartner
JC
Jacob D. CukjatiOf Counsel
AP
Alec PerezAssociate
Also named by the firm
The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.
Client reviews
4.9
★★★★★
Based on 111 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 1 listing, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm
Offices 1 location · main office: San Antonio
San Antonio14414 Blanco Rd Ste 220, San Antonio, TX 78216, USA
Frequently asked questions
How much does Martin & Cukjati charge?
Martin & Cukjati publishes no fee terms on the pages we read, so none is recorded on this profile. An absence here is not a claim that the firm has no fee arrangement, only that it does not state one publicly. The rate itself is not published, so ask for it in writing, along with how case expenses are handled and whether they come out of the recovery before or after the fee. The first consultation is free, which is the place to ask.
Does Martin & Cukjati offer a free consultation?
Yes. Martin & Cukjati publishes a free initial consultation.
Where does Martin & Cukjati have offices?
Martin & Cukjati publishes one office, in San Antonio. Addresses and the Google listing behind each one are on this profile under Offices.
Who are the attorneys at Martin & Cukjati?
Martin & Cukjati names four attorneys on its own site, and each is listed on this profile with the page we read them from. They have not been checked against a state register: Texas does not publish an attorney register we can query, so licensure is not verified here. The state's own attorney search is the place to check it.
What has Law Firm Listings verified about Martin & Cukjati?
Martin & Cukjati scores 32 and sits at Verified. Passed: entity registration, website and footprint. Could not be answered from any public source and therefore counts neither for nor against the firm: licensure and discipline. Every row of the scorecard above names where the value came from and when it was read. Nothing on this profile was supplied by the firm for payment, and no placement here can be bought.