1. Home
  2. Los Angeles, CA
  3. Personal Injury
  4. Martinian Lawyers

Martinian Lawyers

LFL Verified 2026Personal InjuryLos Angeles, CA● Accepting new clients
★★★★★ 4.8 · 515 Google reviews2 offices12 attorneysEnglish
ContingencyFee model
PaidInitial consultation
24/7intake line
7Practice areas

About Martinian Lawyers

Martinian Lawyers is a personal injury firm with offices in Valley Village and Van Nuys.

The firm states that it works on a contingency fee, with nothing to pay unless the case is won; its intake line is open around the clock.

What this firm has earned Every one from a measured value, with the evidence behind it

LFL Verified 2026

Every eligibility gate this firm's state allows us to check has been checked and held: licensure, discipline, entity, website and footprint. Certification additionally requires a score of 70.

No public discipline

No named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 7 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here

515 client reviews

Counted across 2 verified Google Business Profile listings, not collected by us and not solicited through us.

4.78 average over 515 reviews

A high rating is easy at low volume and hard to hold at this one. Pillar C scores it against the market rather than against five stars.

33 results published

Across 12 case types on the firm's own site. We read the page and counted what is on it; the amounts are the firm's and we have not confirmed them.

LFL Certification Score Scored under Methodology v2.0 · rows tagged Registry, Observed or Ahrefs are measured; rows tagged Illustrative are sample values pending full verification

59out of 100
LFL Certification Score · Methodology v2.0Scored across 87 of the 87 points this firm's state lets anyone measure, out of 100 in the methodology: 13 of them need a register that California does not publish for us to read. Anything unscored counts neither for nor against the firm.

Verified

4 of 5 eligibility gates passed. 1 could not be answered from the available records (G3) and does not count against the firm. Strongest pillar: C; most headroom in pillar E (4/15).

LFL Verified 2026
6 points to Certified
65 needed · A+B+C floor met (68% of the A, B and C points assessed)
Most headroom: A2 Experience: +5 available · A6 Roster verifiability: +4.5 available · B3 Results disclosure: +4 available
G1 Licensure7 of 12 named attorneys hold an active California licence and none carries an adverse status. 5 name(s) could not be told apart from namesakes and are counted neither way
G2 DisciplineNo named attorney carries a disbarment, a suspension or a disciplinary resignation on the State Bar of California's record, across the 7 we identified. Administrative suspensions, which the State Bar states are non-disciplinary, are not counted here
G3 Entity & officeNot published by CA2 physical locations verified on Google Business Profile. California publishes no business register we are able to query, so the registration itself is not verified here. The state's own business search is the place to check it.
G5 WebsiteSite has served over HTTPS, a working phone number published, 8 named attorneys published, and 4 more people in roles the firm states are not a lawyer's.
G6 Footprint515 public client reviews across 2 Google listings, above the 10 minimum, and the firm's domain has been registered since 2007-12-14, so it has been operating for more than a year
Professional Standing
10/25
A2 ExperienceRegistryMean 7.6 years since admission across 7 of 8 named attorneys (longest 20, shortest 1) · NYS Attorney Registration database5 / 10
A6 Roster verifiabilityRegistry7 of 8 named attorneys matched to the California register; no bar number published on any bio4.5 / 9
A5 AccountabilityObservedno bar or trial lawyers' association named on the pages we read · no professional liability cover disclosed, which is not scored here: plaintiff firms in this market do not publish it, and an absence shared by every firm separates none of them0 / 3
BPublished Outcomes
11/15
B1 Results publishedFirm-submitted33 results published on the firm's own site, counted from stated amounts6 / 6
B2 SpecificityFirm-submitted12 case types named; 1 court or county reference5 / 5
B3 Results disclosureFirm-submittedNo prior-results disclaimer on the results page. A past result is not a prediction of another one, and the disclaimer is the sentence that says so0 / 4
CClient Experience
18/20
C1 Authentic volumeObserved515 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count5 / 5
C2 Rating qualityObservedGoogle rating 4.78 over 515 reviews → Bayesian 4.79 (prior 4.83 weighted as 100 reviews, from 1410 scored firms) · single platform, Google only4 / 6
C3 Review recencyGoogle10 of 10 sampled reviews are from the last 12 months (newest 2026-09-02) · a sample of five per business listing, not every review5 / 5
C5 Complaint shareGoogle0 of 10 sampled reviews rate 1 or 2 stars · a sample, so this is the shape of the complaints rather than a count of them4 / 4
DDigital Presence & Authority
8/25
D1 Website trust & experienceObservedCWV fail · no fee statement · privacy policy · disclaimer · fresh content · scored out of 5 of the 7: nothing has measured accessibility or bar numbers on bios here yet, so it is not counted against this firm2 / 5
D2 Search authorityAhrefs · 2026-10-19DR 27.0 → 72th pct of 141-firm cohort (median 13) 2/3 · 1,155 referring domains, 50th pct 1/2 · 142 organic keywords / 1,080 visits·mo, 74th pct 1/2 · brand demand 0/1 (pending)4 / 8
D3 Local presenceGoogle2 operational Google Business Profile listings · 10 or more photos, which is where the API stops counting · 5 categories, hours published, which almost every listing here has and so separates nobody · the services list, Q&A and recent posts are owner-side fields the Places API does not expose, and NAP consistency across citations and local-pack rank have no source here, so the rest of this sub-factor leaves the scale rather than being scored as unearned1 / 1
D4 Content, E-E-A-T & schemaAhrefs · 2026-10-19JSON-LD detected 1/1 · not assessed on any firm yet, so content depth and earned media and AI citations leave the scale (4 pts)1 / 1
EAccess & Responsiveness
4/15
E1 Free consult & fee transparencyObservedContingency · the fee percentage itself is not published2 / 6
E3 Languages & accessibilityObservedEnglish0 / 4
E4 AvailabilityObserved24/7 intake line2.5 / 5
Next automated re-check: Nov 1, 2026 · Cohort: Los Angeles Personal Injury (144 firms measured)How the score works →

Digital presence snapshot

Pillar D signals, re-measured monthly. Paid advertising is not scored.

Domain authority
27· 71th percentile
1,155 ref. domains · cohort median 13.5 · Ahrefs rank 5.7M
Observed · Ahrefs, 2026-10-19
Trust pages
4 / 4
privacy policy · attorney bios · disclaimer · blog
Observed
Core Web Vitals
Failmobile
Performance 55
Observed · PSI, 2026-10-12

Case results Only results verified against court records or documentation show amounts

What the firm publishes itself

Martinian Lawyers lists 33 case results on its own website, across 12 case types. The page carries no disclaimer about past results. We have read the page and counted what is on it. We have not confirmed the amounts, so none are repeated here.

motor vehicletruckpremiseswrongful deathworkplacepedestrianassaultdrug offensehomicidesex offensewhite collarfederal charges
See the firm's own results page ↗

Results are specific to their facts and do not guarantee similar outcomes. Firms submit results through their claimed profile; only results we can substantiate are published with amounts.

Attorneys 7 attorneys · every licence checked against the California attorney register · 1 more person is named by the firm without a role, so we do not call them attorneys · 4 people are named in a role that is not a lawyer’s

IB
Ilia BorisovAttorney
IH
Ian HartsfieldAttorney
TV
Tom VertanousAttorney
MM
Michael MinasianAttorney
AZ
Arash H. ZabetianManaging Partner
TM
Tigran MartinianAttorney & Founder
NP
Nairi PashabezyanAttorney

Also named by the firm

The firm lists this person among its team and prints no role beside the name, so we do not describe them as attorneys.

Also named by the firm, in a role that is not a lawyer’s

The firm names these people among its team and prints the role below beside the names. They are not counted as attorneys.

Client reviews

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 515 Google reviews · Google Business Profile via Places API. 2 listings, counts summed and rating weighted by count · Quotes below are testimonials published by the firm

Offices 2 locations · main office: Valley Village

Valley Village12722 Riverside Dr Ste 100, Valley Village, CA 91607, USA
Van Nuys14349 Victory Blvd Ste 201B, Van Nuys, CA 91401, USA